devfuuu@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agoLe torturelemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up12.19Karrow-down127
arrow-up12.16Karrow-down1imageLe torturelemmy.worlddevfuuu@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squarenaught@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoI’ve heard some people even use :wq over :x
minus-squareCodeBlooded@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years ago….I’ve been using :wq for years…
minus-squarenaught@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoRepent! Imagine all of the wasted productivity! Ahhhhhhhhh
minus-squarePseudoSpock@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoWhat? No “Esc. Shift+ZZ” ?
minus-squaretool@r.rosettast0ned.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoThat sounds like emacs-user talk. We don’t take kindly to you folks around these parts…
minus-squarePseudoSpock@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoIt’s straight up vi, bro.
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoCompositions don’t bother me. Repititions do
I’ve heard some people even use
:wqover:x….I’ve been using :wq for years…
Repent! Imagine all of the wasted productivity! Ahhhhhhhhh
What? No “Esc. Shift+ZZ” ?
That sounds like emacs-user talk. We don’t take kindly to you folks around these parts…
It’s straight up vi, bro.
This is the way
Compositions don’t bother me. Repititions do