We’re looking to put together some more detailed rules on what should and should not be submitted to the instance. Things such as, but not exclusively:

  • What types of message you would always like to see removed on sight
  • Whether there are any types of message which should be left up (borderline, with strong corrections from the community)
  • Where the line is drawn on political views (and how gray areas should be treated)

I’ll make no bones: Moderating uk/ukpol has been a learning experience for me.
I’ve learned that there often isn’t much difference between “leaving a comment up because the community has done an excellent job highlighting flaws” and “I should have removed this hours ago, the community shouldn’t have to do this”.
As there isn’t a way to mod-tag a post, inaction on negative posts can reflect badly on the instance as a whole.

Having some clear guidelines/rules will hopefully simplify things.
And more admins should mean that if a report isn’t looked at, someone can review it as an escalation.

I’ve also enabled the slur filters. And we’ll be listening to see if anything needs adding/removing (the template had swearing blocked :| )

So…Answers on a postcard, I guess!

  • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I appreciate the input. I’ll be honest, bigots getting hounded is my preference too.
    But a couple of times, I’ve been hounded for not deleting the bigot posts. That’s one of the reasons I was keen to get feedback, to find out what people would prefer.
    As if most of the feddit.uk members are keen for that, it’ll become policy.

    • BluesF@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish I could say I was surprised… I think there’s a need for online spaces where bigotry is just absolutely not tolerated, but I’m not sure every space should become one.