slothrop@lemmy.ca to Nostalgia@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agoit never sounded the same afterlemmy.caimagemessage-square81linkfedilinkarrow-up1624arrow-down165
arrow-up1559arrow-down1imageit never sounded the same afterlemmy.caslothrop@lemmy.ca to Nostalgia@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square81linkfedilink
minus-squareDavel23@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s meant to be a joke, right?
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 months agoDo you realistically think someone commenting on the Fediverse about media would seriously consider audio cassettes, one of the most popular media formats of the twentieth century, to be an obscure format?
minus-squareslackassassin@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoI mean, I’ve seen dumber. So, yes?
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoIf I actually thought they were obscure it seems unlikely I would have known the name of the format.
minus-squareslackassassin@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoJust having a goof out here but, yes, it is possible to know the name of obscure things.
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoPossible but not probable in this context.
That’s meant to be a joke, right?
Do you realistically think someone commenting on the Fediverse about media would seriously consider audio cassettes, one of the most popular media formats of the twentieth century, to be an obscure format?
I mean, I’ve seen dumber. So, yes?
If I actually thought they were obscure it seems unlikely I would have known the name of the format.
Just having a goof out here but, yes, it is possible to know the name of obscure things.
Possible but not probable in this context.