Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 18 days agoJustice Department begins releasing long-awaited files tied to Epstein sex trafficking investigationapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down12cross-posted to: celebnews@thelemmy.club
arrow-up1127arrow-down1external-linkJustice Department begins releasing long-awaited files tied to Epstein sex trafficking investigationapnews.comRedditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 18 days agomessage-square16linkfedilinkcross-posted to: celebnews@thelemmy.club
minus-squareMonkeyDumpster@lemmy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up46·18 days ago[redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted]
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42·edit-218 days agoThere’s literally a 119 page grand jury testimony that’s fully redacted. Over 90% of the docs are fully redacted. Like Jesus talk about Malicious Compliance EDIT: adding a link https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 3/EFTA00005586.pdf
minus-squaremeco03211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·18 days agoExcept they aren’t complying. They haven’t released as much as they should have.
minus-squareGerudo@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up13·18 days agoThey were also only supposed to redeact victim information.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·18 days agoTrue. There’s also supposed to be explanations for these and right now there’s jack shit.
minus-squaremonkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·18 days agoI think they have 15 days to provide explanations for the redactions.
minus-squareTolookahlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·18 days agoEach page has trump’s name mentioned on it, all 119 pages. Several times per page
minus-squareFreshParsnip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·18 days agoAnd when they don’t…nothing will be done about it
minus-squareFreshParsnip@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11·18 days agoThat’s not malicious compliance, that’s just noncompliance. Maybe it technically meets the definition of malicious compliance but I simply refuse to call it that
minus-squareRhoeri@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoYeah. I honesty don’t know why anyone bothers or cares at this point.
[redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted]
There’s literally a 119 page grand jury testimony that’s fully redacted.
Over 90% of the docs are fully redacted.
Like Jesus talk about Malicious Compliance
EDIT: adding a link
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 3/EFTA00005586.pdf
Except they aren’t complying. They haven’t released as much as they should have.
They were also only supposed to redeact victim information.
True. There’s also supposed to be explanations for these and right now there’s jack shit.
I think they have 15 days to provide explanations for the redactions.
Each page has trump’s name mentioned on it, all 119 pages. Several times per page
And when they don’t…nothing will be done about it
That’s not malicious compliance, that’s just noncompliance. Maybe it technically meets the definition of malicious compliance but I simply refuse to call it that
Yeah. I honesty don’t know why anyone bothers or cares at this point.