• Anekdoteles@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny, how even this, which was an often cited use case for smart contracts of more sophisticated blockchain token like Ether, is totally not dependent on any blockchain.

    • copacetic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have yet to see anything legal which actually benefits from a blockchain (and isn’t about the blockchain stuff itself, like trading crypto currencies).

      • albert69stein@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been working with a company that uses a very common blockchain to timestamp documents/artwork/data etc.

        It’s a niche use case but it simply couldn’t be done before the existance of blockchains.

        • copacetic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Could you elaborate why a blockchain is beneficial here? The use case “timestamp documents/artwork/data” does not call for a blockchain to me.

          • albert69stein@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Previously this timestamping was accredited by notaries. This had the problems of cost and the trust in a notary did not translate well internationally.

            Now it is almost free to do and the cost of manipulating a blockchain (if possible at all) far outweighs the potential gain from malice.