• Fatmaninalilcoat@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t have to hit the barrels they usually aim for weak spots hoping for penetration then the round bounces around inside taking everyone out.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anti-material rifles were initially designed to take out tanks. However all modern tanks have thick enough armor to deflect its bullets.

      Now APC’s, trucks, vans, and most engines and electronics are destroyed by these rounds. Hence the anti-material label now.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given some of the antique tanks the Russians pulled out of the moth ball heap, it might still be an anti-tank-weapon occasionally …

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          The barrel is thicker than the armor on tanks. Usually they weigh in at over 2 tons of steel. The circular shape also makes it very likely to deflect the impact like sloped armor.

          It might make a little ding in the paint.