Do Californians want to be bought by Denmark? Then that’s just feeding into Trump’s idea of buying Greenland, because they supposedly want it. Do Californians not want to be bought by Denmark? Then that’s feeding into Denmark being worse than the US.
Never mind the fact that this is make-believe nonsense that is totally detached from Denmark’s actual ability to buy California.
No it doesn’t because greenlanders don’t want to be bought and every single poll is going to bear that out, while Californians might actually go for this, at least in the abstract. The universal healthcare is a massive jump up in quality of living whereas Greenland under US rule is a massive dripping whatever QOL they have.
Also, the US isn’t asking to buy Greenland, they’re pretending they’d buy it and then are just going to take it and then not pay anyone anything.
California is rich enough to afford our own universal healthcare system. If we wanted to be distinct from the US, we could “just” secede and still have a massive economy and also have universal healthcare.
Like, there’s literally a slate of candidates running for state positions in California, whose specific platform includes universal healthcare in California.
One proposal for how the US could buy Greenland is direct cash deposits to every person in Greenland, basically buying their loyalty. Now obviously it’s all bullshit, the US just steals and kills to get what it wants, but let’s entertain this idea.
If the US paid each person in Greenland enough to get a majority onboard, basically buying the polls, would that actually be acceptable? Because that’s basically the premise here.
Yeah? Unless you think you know better than them. Or that they shouldn’t be allowed to receive money compensation. I assume most of them are smart enough to know how short the money will go.
I’m aware. Hence, we’re ignoring the fact that it’s make-believe nonsense.
My point is that the punchline of the joke is in contradiction with the presumed intention of the joke. The joke just kind of feeds into Trump’s intentions, rather than poking fun at it.
What is this supposed to prove?
Do Californians want to be bought by Denmark? Then that’s just feeding into Trump’s idea of buying Greenland, because they supposedly want it. Do Californians not want to be bought by Denmark? Then that’s feeding into Denmark being worse than the US.
Never mind the fact that this is make-believe nonsense that is totally detached from Denmark’s actual ability to buy California.
Tbf if I learned California was going to be part of Denmark next week I’d be on the road to California tomorrow
Denmark isn’t great but it’s better than the US
Whichever country is better still fits the underlying premise, that the best country should be the one that rules the colony.
No it doesn’t because greenlanders don’t want to be bought and every single poll is going to bear that out, while Californians might actually go for this, at least in the abstract. The universal healthcare is a massive jump up in quality of living whereas Greenland under US rule is a massive dripping whatever QOL they have.
Also, the US isn’t asking to buy Greenland, they’re pretending they’d buy it and then are just going to take it and then not pay anyone anything.
California is rich enough to afford our own universal healthcare system. If we wanted to be distinct from the US, we could “just” secede and still have a massive economy and also have universal healthcare.
Like, there’s literally a slate of candidates running for state positions in California, whose specific platform includes universal healthcare in California.
Yeah, and?
They’re socialists!
One proposal for how the US could buy Greenland is direct cash deposits to every person in Greenland, basically buying their loyalty. Now obviously it’s all bullshit, the US just steals and kills to get what it wants, but let’s entertain this idea.
If the US paid each person in Greenland enough to get a majority onboard, basically buying the polls, would that actually be acceptable? Because that’s basically the premise here.
Yeah? Unless you think you know better than them. Or that they shouldn’t be allowed to receive money compensation. I assume most of them are smart enough to know how short the money will go.
Well then we’re in agreement - the premise of this joke is feeding into Trump’s idea to buy Greenland.
My point is that it’s in contradiction with the intention of the joke, which is clearly meant to say the opposite.
It’s just a joke
I’m aware. Hence, we’re ignoring the fact that it’s make-believe nonsense.
My point is that the punchline of the joke is in contradiction with the presumed intention of the joke. The joke just kind of feeds into Trump’s intentions, rather than poking fun at it.