• Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Staten Island doesn’t have the subway infrastructure that other boroughs have. The one line it does have does has relatively high usage. Maybe it’s wise to expand it?

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Im not saying Staten Island cant be good, there simply isn’t the political will to improve anything. If their government and people got the heads out of the sand they would notice that there is demand for more rail infrastructure. Kinda like how there’s significant amounts of unmet rail demand in Queens and Brooklyn (hopefully the IBX helps the issue)

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re saying it as if Staten Island is its own city. The truth is that they can’t control the resources to build new lines. That’s something that only the city and state can do, and neither are prioritizing it rn

        • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sure but consider that the MTA could be investing money toward places that would more appreciate it, Queenslink and the IBX are well received and suffer from very little resistance from local politicians. The MTA has almost no reason to invest in a hostile area that until relatively recently was extremely anti public transportation (the MTA operates on a decade long timeframe at a time).

          • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think people make the mistake that NIMBYs represent the population, when in reality they’re just a very vocal and obnoxious minority as is the case in most places. I feel like most people there would appreciate a direct line to either Brooklyn or Manhattan, ideally both. I don’t think the city is wrong per se in prioritizing the other boroughs as they have more people, but I still think that Staten Island shouldn’t be left out of the mix. It’s still a big part of the city.

            • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Tbh if they want MTA investment they’re going to need to have their public transit supports make some massive noise, because rn the MTA and the politicians see Nimbys. Also there are a few key issues with this that need to be kept in mind:

              • The Staten Island railway is sorta doing its own thing so integration would expensive
              • The Verrazzano Bridge is not suitable for rail in general
              • Making a new bridge would be incredibly expensive
              • Making a tunnel would be even more expensive
              • Making a tunnel directly to Manhattan would be absolutely expensive
              • The subway service that serves that part of Brooklyn seems a bit overextended already