• Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    But more bioavailability. People always forget that factor.

    And that’s assuming the vegetables are raw, of course, because they lose a lot of the nutrients when cooked as well.

    Fruits are a better source usually.

    • ColeSloth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Actually, cooking vegetables tends to give you more vitamins and such out of them. So long as they aren’t boiled.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        No.

        It makes certain nutrients more bioavailabile, but destroys others that are heat sensitive, like Vitamin C.

        And even then that is based on how you cook them. As you said, boiling for example leaches out potassium. But, if you’re still going to use or drink the liquid, your still get the potassium. It’s why you should drink the soup if you make bean soup - you have to boil beans.

        But then there’s things like iron - that one is already bioavailabile in meat, but the kind plants have is different, and require an acid to preactivate them beforehand (that’s why it’s good to add some balsamic vinegar or lemon juice to a salad for example).

        Others have nutrients that are poorly absorbed and irritate the stomach that you don’t want, especially since they’ll block absorption of other minerals. Pecans for example you need to soak and drain a few times ideally to get rid of this bad phosphorus (I think it was hexadecaphosphate?) for hours before roasting them to get the most minerals you can from them.

        And there’s a lot more. You can learn and memorize this if you’re not vegan to eat healthier - or you can just eat a piece of meat. You can maybe see why people pick the latter. I don’t agree they should, btw, just explaining why some do.