• ThermonuclearHoxha [comrade/them, mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.netEnglish
    52·
    8 days ago

    Excerpt from the US explanation of the vote (full text at https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-for-unga-resolution/):

    The United States has defined, long-standing objections to the framing of “reparatory justice” and the “duty of reparation” for historical wrongs. While we acknowledge the horrors of the past, we do not accept this resolution’s assertion that historical facts from the 15th through 19th centuries constitute violations of jus cogens as that term is understood in contemporary international law. The United States also does not recognize a legal right to reparations for historical wrongs that were not illegal under international law at the time they occurred.

    gulag

    • electric_nan@lemmy.mlEnglish
      28·
      8 days ago

      Implying that the US has ever given a fuck about “international law” where it might inconvenience them in any way.

    • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      26·
      8 days ago

      Good link! Wow.

      full text

      Explanation of Vote for UNGA Resolution “Declaration of the Trafficking of Enslaved Africans and Racialised Chattel Enslavement of Africans as the Gravest Crime Against Humanity”

      By United States Mission to the United Nations

      5 MINUTE READ

      March 25, 2026

      Ambassador Dan Negrea
      United States Representative to the United Nations Economic and Social Council
      New York, New York

      AS DELIVERED

      Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

      The United States remains steadfast in its opposition to and condemnation of the historic wrongs that resulted from the trans-Atlantic slave trade, the trans-Saharan slave trade, and all other forms of slavery. We remain committed to the acknowledgement that these are historical wrongs. Despite this, the United States observes that the text of this resolution remains highly problematic in countless respects. Consequently, the United States cannot support the adoption of this resolution.

      We regret that the United States must once again remind this body that the United Nations exists to maintain international peace and security. It was not founded to advance narrow, specific interests and agendas, to establish niche international days, or to create new costly meeting and reporting mandates. This resolution does all three.

      The United States has defined, long-standing objections to the framing of “reparatory justice” and the “duty of reparation” for historical wrongs. While we acknowledge the horrors of the past, we do not accept this resolution’s assertion that historical facts from the 15th through 19th centuries constitute violations of jus cogens as that term is understood in contemporary international law. The United States also does not recognize a legal right to reparations for historical wrongs that were not illegal under international law at the time they occurred.

      In addition to its obvious legal problems, this resolution is also unclear as to whom the recipients of “reparatory justice” would be. The drafters and supporters of this resolution seem to believe it is them. The United States strongly objects to the cynical usage of historical wrongs as a leverage point in an attempt to reallocate modern resources to people and nations who are distantly related to the historical victims.

      As stated at the outset of these negotiations, the United States also strongly objects to the resolution’s attempt to rank crimes against humanity in any type of hierarchy. The assertion that some crimes against humanity are less severe than others objectively diminishes the suffering of countless victims and survivors of other atrocities throughout history. This is not a competition. This attempted ranking is also simply incorrect as a matter of law.

      The United States would also like to express disappointment in the arbitrarily historical perspective of the text. Trafficking of African slaves began long before the 15th century and sadly continued even after the 19th. These dates were clearly selected for political reasons rather than historical accuracy. All trafficking of enslaved Africans and racialised chattel enslavement of Africans deserves to be condemned, not merely the politically expedient.

      Also, there are some fake news articles suggesting that the sponsors of this resolution called into question President Trump’s support of the Black community. We reject any such suggestions. Indeed, President Trump has done more for Black Americans than any other president and enjoyed historic support from the Black community in the 2024 election. He is working around the clock to deliver for them and make our country greater than ever.

      Finally, we must express our deep disappointment regarding the process that led to this text. Throughout drafting, the United States and other delegations offered constructive contributions aimed at aligning the text with established international legal frameworks. These contributions were ignored.

      For these reasons, the United States will vote “no” on this resolution.

      Thank you.

      The idea of crimes done “a long time ago” being non-reparable would be a lot stronger if wealth and power could also evaporate over a couple generations.

      But seeing as families still have property that was acquired during that time, can’t really claim a clean slate.

      • ThermonuclearHoxha [comrade/them, mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.netEnglish
        9·
        8 days ago

        Yes, even if the US had actually achieved total racial equality and reparations domestically by now (which is definitely far from the case), one must conclude from examining the pre-global value chain economy and the status of the US as a superpower that such wealth and power overwhelmingly remains present within the nation of the US, so in the context of international politics, the US and European powers owe such reparations to the African countries they subjugated.

        • Lowleekun [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
          5·
          7 days ago

          To many Asian countries as well. We “were” quite fond of enslaving, oppressing and looting the ever living hell out of others. It is so baked in to European culture that we actually fear everyone might do this to us if the power imbalance ever shifts against us.

          (US culture is just colonymaxxing, so a bunch of euroclo(w)nes)

  • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
    40·
    8 days ago

    Argentina out here proving the old “libertarianism: where everything is r*** and slavery, except for actual r*** and slavery which are fine” adage.

  • sorter_plainview@lemmy.todayEnglish
    30·
    8 days ago

    Also note that almost all of the Europian countries abstained from voting. I think we are seeing the effects of colonialism.

    The resolution talks about ‘reparatory justice’ which I think these colonialists, and countries benefitted from slave trade are afraid of. I feel they see it as, if they agree to it they will have to take actions now and in future, and have to pay or compensate for the injustice.

    The justification given by US is utter bullshit. Wealth of western countries mainly came from extracting resources, both human and material, from Asian and African countries. Claiming otherwise is just ignoring the past and neglecting the injustice.