• HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, there’s something I can’t really grok in the TTRPG community, and it’s the desire for a, how do I put it, “Paint by numbers” sort of adventure. A game where everything goes right, at the exact time its supposed to, with the players only ever making an impact via backstory. No desperate struggle, no clever ideas or unexpected turns, never using the sword of doom to punch through the dread citadel’s walls, only using it for its +3 bonus to strike enemies. I just don’t see the appeal, because to me, that’s just what video games are!

    • sammytheman666@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      " A game where everything goes right, at the exact time its supposed to, with the players only ever making an impact via backstory"

      You never DMed a game before have you ?

        • sammytheman666@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The DM expecting a game to go exactly as planned is a new DM. Nobody with experience on this side of the DM curtains actually expects this. As for the players, it only makes their surprise more tasteful.

          Dont know what game you played where everyone expected things to go according to plan, but plans never survive long for anyone, DM or players

          • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dont know what game you played where everyone expected things to go according to plan, but plans never survive long for anyone, DM or players

            I didnt, I’m referring to the attitude you see in posts like this. Like, in the OP, the fictional GM is picking up the ball and going home because the fictional player is doing something zany. And in the other comments, just take a look at em. There’s a pretty clear air of disdain for that kind of behavior, like its bad manners to do things “clever” in an RPG.

            Without the chaos of player agency, you’ve pretty much just got low quality fiction without any sort of deviation from the course. And I dont know about you, but I dont think thats particularly compelling, dramatic, or memorable. Antics can be messy, but thats kind of the point.

            Eh, but maybe its because I dont play with PUGs anymore. It’s been years since ive played with anyone I could consider a problem player, so maybe ive just lost perspective.

            • sammytheman666@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Heh. A lot of problems also come from the DM not saying no enough. Too much is like not enough. Not saying no every is bad. Saying no too much is bad. Balance like in everything is how you get a great game.

              Nah, I haven’t checked the comments, and following what you said I won’t.

            • Jorgelino@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I see it as the DM realising the items he gave the players are too OP and deciding to remove them. A bit clunky, but reasonable depending on the item, imo.

              I would’ve thought from your previous rant, that you’d be against players having too many OP items, as that can easily lead to the situation you described where everyone always succeeds and there’s no “desperate struggle”, as you put it.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Novice GMs are bad at improvisation and don’t know to prep effectively, hence the railroady nature of the games they run. If you have a GM like that, buy a copy of “The lazy DM” by Mike O’Shea for them.

    • Glytch@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is why I run Paranoia. There’s no danger of anything going according plan in that game. Things will go wrong and they will go wrong catastrophically.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      Русский
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, it is nice some times to have a linear plot. But it is also nice to have player’s creativity give you ideas on what to do. Or shit being on fire, that’s what dice are for.

  • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    lvl 2 player at the lvl 15 end-game citadel: I attempt to break down the walls of the impenetrable fortress with the Sword of Doom

    "A bright flash emanates from the place of contact as the two unbreakable items collide. It expands into a small explosion in an instant, letting out a deafening noise. When your eyes clear from the flash, ears still ringing, a small, 2 foot deep crater is broken out of the 5 foot thick unbreakable wall. Half the sword is vaporized from the heat of the impact, and the powerful runes are destroyed. The shockwave hits your character in a rush of heat and force. Roll a Dex save (or a little force damage).

    Many people far and wide heard the impact. A dragon is rising in the distance from the tower of the dark mages… Wanna run?"

    • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention the demigod who had plans for that sword, right up until the hero wasted it on attempting to be clever. Non-mortals being notoriously petty, one can assume that their cults will haunt this dense bastard like an indelible foot fungus for the rest of their days and then some.

      Unwritten Rule #1: Don’t fuck with the DM. 🥰

  • sammytheman666@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    2 things :

    1- If the item is currently in the game, then it’s the DM that have put them there in the first place. It’s fine to take them away if you made a mistake, but it’s your mistake, better own to it. 2- This is hilarious as I just gave my players a blank check where they can get any item whatsoever. Only one. But I’m waiting with excitement on what they will end up with.

  • nothacking
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let them cook, the result is almost guaranteed to be amusing.

  • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude I once put the Fighter into a vegetative state because of an intelligence level of -1. He tanked all the magic damage with his shield of weaving, but not the effects.