• pillow [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    outside of famine/war conditions, birth rates have historically been (much) higher among people (much) poorer than most americans. I think the difference is more that social support structures are weak, “standard of living” expectations are high, education is both expensive and necessary, and contraception/abortion are widely available and relatively destigmatized

      • emeralddawn45
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah this is a huge part of it. Boomers were able to give their kids good lives. Millennial can’t even give their kids the same standard they have. People want to give their kids a better life than they had, but this is impossible without a house and a yard and extra money for game consoles and extracurricular and playmates and all the shit that was taken for granted in a 90s childhood.

        • Jacobo_Villa_Lobos [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nail on the head. Would my hypothetical kids be fine without the treats I was given as a child? Probably.

          Would it be exhausting to justify internally, explain to people, and face judgement from family? Definitely.

    • CrimsonSage@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is arguable as a lot if the “all people before capitalism were mud farmers” claptrap comes from the fact that the priests of capitalism always leave non market/capitalist goods out of their calculations. Like medieval pesants were wealthier than early modern farmhands because they had the commons.