Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 年前AI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happywww.androidpolice.comexternal-linkmessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1122arrow-down10
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkAI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happywww.androidpolice.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 年前message-square50linkfedilink
minus-squareJohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 年前If it’s something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That’s just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.
minus-squaresculd@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前Agreed. Butterbee’s explanation in this thread is much better than my word.
minus-squareRandoCalrandian@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前Is there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?
If it’s something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That’s just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.
Agreed. Butterbee’s explanation in this thread is much better than my word.
Is there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?