• insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    How I remade Game™ in-

    YOU FOOL!

    How difficult is it to call it something like Toby Bird’s Overground? Feels particularly silly on somewhere like Youtube, where if the video blows up it’s likely any future hopes for your project will too (and this could happen at any arbitrary point in the future, though probably with a change of staff or just before a new competing title is about to be released).

    That and I feel that at least a little plausible deniability (while matching the feel) would add to the “Hey, has anyone ever told you that you look like Tony Hawk?” joke.

    (see also the video PSA: A Message to Unofficial Fan Game Creators)

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Eh, it’s a POC, I highly doubt they’ll finish it and try to monetize it. They just want to show what’s possible with a small amount of work.

      • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m not even talking about monetization, just that they’re making and announcing something that is obviously DMCA-bait. Even the video could be taken down without consequence (even if it didn’t have monetization enabled, also the corp could force enable and get the money). This is a common thing that happens and it seems completely pointless and easy to avoid (again, even just plausible deniability/under-the-radar level).

        If somebody was going to make a video cooking something “just for fun”/learning, I’d also say they should still try to be mindful of food safety rather than saying “if I get food poisoning, I can deal with that. Don’t do-as-I-do”.

        Or in other words, just have some discretion.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m no lawyer, but I don’t see anything here that violates fair use. I see:

          • short clips from the game - they are a very small portion of the video, so it’s fair use
          • deobfuscation of game files - this has been decided in the courts as fair use; the law draws the line at breaking encryption
          • modification of copyrighted files - the law has consistently defended modification for personal use and draws the line at redistribution
          • no redistribution

          The channel has 80 subs and two videos, so I’m guessing the creator doesn’t even have access to monetization, so there’s no financial concern here. So I see absolutely no cause for concern in this video. If they were using decrypted files, then I could see an issue with the DMCA encryption provisions.

          • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s why I said without consequence. By that I specifically meant that a takedown could be used no matter the context. Non-infringing videos are often taken down and often people don’t even fight it because doing so can result in strikes.

            Most people probably aren’t going to fight anything in court let alone compete with an expensive team of lawyers, so they aren’t ever going to get even the slightest pushback if they overstep things. That’s why I say it’s better to distance yourself from trademarks as much as possible.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Sure, but this would have to get popular enough that the devs care enough to issue a strike. I highly doubt Activision/Microsoft is going to bother, and if they did, I don’t think the name of the video is going to matter much, if it gets popular enough, they’ll hear about it either way.

              • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I mean often times they just have a script that looks for the trademarked terms (or in some cases, visual matches, or music for video), so it does matter using such things. At least when something it released, if it’s largely original work using trademarked names/logos is an easy way to shoot yourself in the foot (and can result in very early detection).

                I also doubt takedowns are usually a higher-up hearing about said projects and “ordering the strike” (probably just that it popped up on an automated/intern-ran script), that’s why I think even the easiest changes would be good to do. Because they probably aren’t ever going to see Jimmy Eagle even if it were uploaded and popular.

                The video part isn’t really important to my point, just the general idea that involving trademarked stuff is basically a multiplier for risk. Some simple changes and fans will still see what it is and like it, scripts won’t. And people fail to see this too often, so I don’t think people should encourage it because “it’s probably fine”.

  • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Playing the remake of Tony hawk pro skater 1+2 makes me want remakes of all the classics…

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do wish that particular remake had included Underground’s addition of being able to get off the board and just walk around. It’s so much easier to setup a line when you can walk and not just constantly coast around.

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That was the plan before Activision was unimpressed by the numbers.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It was pretty great, basically an open world THPS. You’d level up your skills but using them, get quests from people in the world, and join tournaments to progress to the next area. It was a lot of fun, and I really hope it gets a revisit.

      • maxprime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not exactly open world as there were distinct levels you would beat, and warp between.

        American Wasteland was the first “open world” TH game. Followed by Proving Ground and Project 8. Although AW was basically the same as UG except the levels were separated by long ass hallways to give the effect that it was one world. No loading screens though!

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I wish Underground, Underground 2 and American Wasteland got remasters.

    I don’t remember them being well liked at the time, but they were the best ones IMO. The only disappointment in American Wasteland was that by UG2, the series was perfected. Wasteland just gave us more of the same, and I guess to many that was already boring. Plus there was just a lot of people that hated Bam Margera in general.