They come and go. They’re random clutter. We only need a few big instances that hosts a majority of the communities and that’s it. Why do we need so many smaller ones?

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The core issue here is instances disappearing, and That goes into the discussion of the structure of the fediverse right now vs. the fediverse in the future

    A dozen big instances feel better now, and I personally wouldn’t make a community on a smaller instance unless I know it is likely to stay up. If it was run by an existing organization for example.

    Long term though, I trust existing organizations to set up stable instances that won’t be shut down easily. If a government, school, game company etc. makes an instance it’s not likely to go down. Having lots of instances will look more normal then.

    Ultimately we don’t need to do anything differently, I recommend new people join a big instance and then make a new account once they know what instance they like.


    note to everyone: please don’t downvote good faith questions

    OP asked a pretty reasonable open ended question. There are other people who may be thinking the same, and reading the discussions here might change their minds. Save downvoting for rule breaking / content that’s bad for the community

    • Blaze
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      note to everyone: please don’t downvote good faith questions

      Thank you for this

    • SharkAttak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be nice to be able to backup your magazine/community, so if for example random.lemmy goes down, you can still migrate your /mini4wd elsewhere. Don’t know how it could be implemented though, I’m still in the “i get it but not really” phase with the Fediverse.