specifically : a historical process by which the semantic and connotative status of a word tends to decline

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Again, if you want to conserve capitalism, you’re a liberal to Socialists. I understand classical, libertarian, social, neoliberal definitions. The consensus among socialists is that liberalism supports capitalism.

    • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Again, if you want to conserve capitalism, you’re a liberal to Socialists.

      Sooo what you’re saying is that Socialists think conservatives are liberals?

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yes, in the sense they also believe in the neoliberal free-market and private-property capitalism. This also means liberals are still right wing, albeit much further to the left than conservatives.

        Both conservatives and so-called liberals believe in free market capitalism, despite having radically different points of view when it comes to social issues like racism, poverty, guns etc. Socialists agree with left-leaning liberals on the vast majority of social issues btw.

        In a nutshell, if you think really good representatives could fix most of the issues with capitalism as it stands you are a liberal/neoliberal. If you think the current capitalist system can’t be fixed by just changing the players without changing the game you are a leftist/socialist. You can go further left than you might be used to, this is where this confusion comes from.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Socialists think conservatives are liberals?

        It’s not that we think that… it’s just that we don’t really see much of a difference.