GrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down13 cross-posted to: linux_gaming@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.netandroid@kbin.socialgames@sh.itjust.worksantitrust@lemmy.mltechnology@kbin.socialandroid@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1174arrow-down1external-linkGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comGrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square14fedilink cross-posted to: linux_gaming@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@hexbear.netandroid@kbin.socialgames@sh.itjust.worksantitrust@lemmy.mltechnology@kbin.socialandroid@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year agoHow exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?