• lps2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    We’ll see how the Saudis feel about him pissing away their money. Gonna be taking that Tesla stock from him

    • Tyfud@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      You say that like the Saudi’s aren’t cool with taking Twitter down. It was the cause of a lot of strife and issues during the “Arab Spring” years.

      I suspect they’re overjoyed it’s tanking.

      • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        A small price to pay for them to be killing informational pipelines. It was good to be able to actually talk to politicians in my country, a bit of astroturfing for the greater good.

      • nicetriangle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep those kinda of governments thrive best when there isn’t an easy way for common people to spread news about them and organize.

      • Airazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t see the point of this whole charade, rebranding, slow death. Why not just buy it and close all servers if that’s their goal?

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Because that’s a definite action.
          If they wanted twitter destabilised, “giving” it to someone that is going to mismanage it (either deliberately mismanage it, or because they are an egotistical eccentric rich person who aspires to be a tech guru entrepreneur genius) is a much more subtle way to achieve it.

          Adding:
          Worst case, they have leverage over the company to remove/censor content. Even if that was their initial goal, having twitter collapse is still in their interest