• TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I guess the catch is the fact that they don’t really need it. They have real time location from any Android device anyways (because of that feature that sends the lists of wifi networks around you from time to time), no need to storage the timeline on their servers, it’s only duplicate data. lol

    • EarthlingHazard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      From your desktop browser? Probably. You’ll still be able to use timeline from your phone though since the data is still being stored locally

  • Ethalia@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    When big tech says they no longer need something, it means they have something even better. When they say they give you options, they mean dark patterns. Anytime you click ‘Decline’ it might as well be ‘Accept all’. Rapist mentality of big corpos.

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Personally, I use GPSLogger from FDroid on a 15 minute ping interval and then load the files into Location Map Viewer (also FDroid) for my own location tracking. Disabled Google awhile ago.

    I back the files up to a home NAS.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not that simple. The user has to hold the key. And with cloud you want it to all be accessible from all of a users devices. And with a public service you can’t count on the user to be savvy enough to use their certificates.

      Of course the fix to that is that the key is stored in the account.

      But then Google has the key and can decrypt it.

      So then the key itself has to be encrypted. And with what? The users weak ass-password?

      All encryption has to begin with something that’s known, and the weaker that initial secret, the weaker the entire system below it.

  • epyon22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Curious on the implementation. For example apps like signal and WhatsApp require you to either move or lose your data when you get a new phone. This will have to be the way Google implements or they are storing it somewhere on their servers.

  • Pectin8747@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I don’t think people here realize that not holding on to is different from no longer processing the data for their own means… There’s no doubt in my mind that Google just simply has no need to keep the old data around anymore once other processing like for ML models and ad targeting are completed