Title. Besides setting tmpfs to use 10GiB of it to store downloads.

  • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Run not one, but two electron based apps? 😅

    All jokes aside, most desktop apps and web browsers, nowadays, use ungodly amounts of RAM. The pessimist in me blames Chrome and electron, but in reality it just comes down to programmers being more accustom to having access to more memory than they need.

    I say relax and enjoy the lack of slowdowns - having too much RAM is not a problem, but having too little is. Your only concern should ever be trying to avoid the latter, and with 32gb of RAM you should be good until the next big Discord update. (slight /s on that last point)

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    With the rate at which Electron applications catch on? Nothing, you’ll end up using it all in a few years time.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    RAM is the kind of thing you’re better off having too much than not enough. Worst case the OS ends up with a very healthy and large file cache, which frees up your storage and makes things a bit faster/lets it spend the CPU on other things. If anything, your machine is future proofed against the ever increasing RAM hungriness of web apps. But if you run out of it, you get apps killed, hangs or major slowdowns as it hits the swap.

    The thing with RAM is that it’s easy for 99% of your workload to fit comfortably, and then there’s one thing you temporarily need a bit more and you’re screwed. My machine usually uses 8-12/32GB of RAM but yet I still ended up needing to add swap to my machine. Just opening up the Lemmy source code and spinning up the Rust LSP can use a solid 8+GB alone. I’ve compiled some AUR packages that needed more than 16GB of RAM. I have 16 cores so compiling anything with -j32 can very quickly bring down a machine to its knees even if each compile thread is only using like 256-512MB each.

    Another example: my netbook has 8GB. 99% of the time it’s fine, because it’s a web browsing machine, and I probably average on 4GB usage on a heavy day with lots of tabs open. But if I open up VSCode and use any LSP be it TypeScript or Rust, the machine immediately starts swapping aggressively. I had to log out of my graphical session to compile Lemmy, barely.

    RAM is cheap enough these days it’s nice to have more than you need to not ever have to worry about it.

    • cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have 64GB as future proofing (ITX board, two slots, can’t address any more). Normally I probably use 8 to 10 of those doing things like gaming and hoarding internet tabs like they’re a nonrenewable resource. I actually managed to crash my machine with an out of memory condition compiling something a while back. I don’t remember what and I’m sure it doesn’t count as regular use but I installed ZRAM to prevent it from happening again.

  • chitak166@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nothing. Don’t make up problems for your hardware, lol.

    I’m guessing you listened to someone who didn’t know what they were talking about.

  • NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Here’s a little script I’ve put in my $PATH, called memsum:

    #!/usr/bin/bash
    /usr/bin/ps -eo rss,command --sort -rss | egrep $1 | awk '{ hr=$1/1024 ; sum +=hr} END {print sum}'
    

    Now you can go: memsum firefox or memsum whatever and see that, actually, apps use a ridiculous amount of memory these days.

    I can get Firefox up to 8GB by using things like Office 365.

  • rufus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Nothing. My laptop has 8GB and while this is somewhat the limit, it’s enough to browse, do office stuff, a bit of development/programming and even a bit of CAD for my 3D printer, video editing, retro-gaming and all sorts of things. I’d prefer to have 16GB because Firefox likes to eat a lot of RAM, but the laptop is too old for me to upgrade anything at this point.

    If you’d like to waste your resources, you could run 4 other operating systems simultaneously in VMs. Or try artificial intelligence chatbots and load one of the large language models. They can easily make use of 32GB of memory and more.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Agreed. I have ageing hardware that I upgraded to its maximum 16GB RAM, and I manage to browse the web and do basic office work with that. The most memory intensive work I do beside browsing is in GIMP, and I simply set some sensible virtual memory for that to work.

      Just use a light DE, or even scale back to only a WM. People insisting that KDE or Gnome are lightweight are exactly the same who claim that 32GB RAM is a minimum. Yeah, it is when even your desktop environment is bloated 🙄

      If you’re a gamer and can afford the hardware upgrades to stay at the current bleeding edge, go ahead. I keep an old box alive and make it work instead.

  • MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just wait. In 10 years 32 gig is on the low side to just run the OS. Hardware getest faster and bigger, but software scales with it.

    The more resources are available, the more people will program computers to use them.

    My first graphics card had 128mb memory. These days it goes in gigabyte and they use the memory and processing power to produce amazing things.

    On the other hand, they also are not as critical on efficiëncy as used to be, because there are simply more resources available anyway. As a consequence, some programs use a silly amount of resources for basically doing nothing. Sometimes I really feel like my browser is eating RAM…

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      After boot, I’m using 2GB. I haven’t noticed Linux doing the ram-hog thing like Windows at all. But Firefox is currently using 8GB.

      Just restarted Firefox and it’s using 2.5GB now. I think it stores a lot in ram from video.

        • Verat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          A program that can run on 1GB but uses 2GB is more wasteful, OS and FS level caching and memory reclamation only work if the memory is available, and a program wasting it takes it from everything else, unused RAM is wasted, but so is RAM being used for no actual function.

          Not to say programs cant use large amounts, but they should provide a level of functionality for the amount of memory used, and some programs of late have been more than a bit inefficient, in short, filling the RAM is good, but do make sure its actually being used.

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That means you should waste and occupy as much as possible? Lol.

          I think less of anyone who treats ‘sayings’ like that as absolute fact. Small minds.

  • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Just open a few more Chrome tabs: a couple of Ali Express and Amazon pages and a few YouTube videos and couple Reddit posts, and you’ll be wondering why you only got 32.

  • sebsch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mount your .cache dirs into memory via tmpfs

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I second that, install cockpit if you don’t want to bother with the CLI and run a couple of VMs. You can even start 3 VMs and install Kubernetes on them and play with it.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Open ten tabs in Chrome. Maybe even twelve!

    I don’t think you need 32GB of RAM. 16GB should be enough, and 8 will still do for light tasks (though modern apps and websites are starting to push that, which is terrible). Your OS uses any RAM you don’t use to cache files, which speeds up your system, reduces power consumption, and could save you some SSD wear by caching the writes.

    If you haven’t already, you can mount a tmpfs over your browsers’ cache directories (a bunch of them in ~/.cache or ~/. config). It used to really speed up browsing back in the HDD days. I doubt it’s still necessary, but hey you’ve got plenty of RAM, right?

    If you really don’t do anything but browsing, you could boot your entire OS into RAM and have a 0 SSD latency browsing experience.

    You could also use the RAM to run a bunch of VMs or containers. I used to run a separate Pihole VM, for example; virtual machines are nice and isolated, so you don’t risk ruining your /etc directory with a billion different configured services. The big downside of running such stuff on your machine is that you quickly end up with a whole bunch of duplicates (I have like four versions of postgres running on a server somewhere because I’m lazy) but if you have RAM to spare, that doesn’t matter.

    One container that may be worth looking at is Waydroid (or Anbox if you’re on X11) to run Android apps on your desktop. I find that a bunch of different services have web interfaces thst just don’t work as well as their apps, and running those can be nice. How much of a difference this makes will depend on the services you use, of course.

    Lastly: don’t underestimate the advantages of plenty of RAM when programming. It’ll depend on what language you use, but many compilers will generate a million tiny files that will all be written to disk and read back. SSDs are fast, but random reads are still nowhere close to RAM speed. Your OS will hide most of this overhead, but I definitely felt the difference going from 16GB to 32GB because of file system caching alone.

  • nia_the_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Open 4 browser tabs

    jokes aside, you’re getting benefits from more caching into ram, and you’re also getting the ability to not have to even think about your ram usage, even if the ram isn’t actively being used by apps you’re getting good use just from having it available, the OS has more wiggle room to use it optimally: I have 64GB of ram and regularly use only about 12-20GB of it, currently 6.1GB is being used as cache

    Some apps like Okular (pdf viewer) can be configured to use more ram in the settings, you can set it to be very aggressive about preloading pages so that everything loads faster, set a very high amount of scrollback in your terminal if wanted, etc

    I’ve never done this so I can’t speak to how much benefit there is from it, but you can set up a way to preload/cache your most used apps into ram, so that they’re always fully loaded and ready to go