we live in hell

I don’t even understand the pitch? you have the disc playing, in your hands, your ownership, no buffering, no subscription required. and they’re saying…hey do you want a worse experience?

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’re taking pictures of what you’re watching on the screen and sending it to random 3rd party data collectors to analyze and then harass you with ads.

    • Deiv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or just reading the file name on the DVD lol

        • gentooer@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Would it be possible to argue that this is copyright infringement? They’re basically screencapping copyrighted content at a shitty framerate and distributing it over the internet.

          • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Whooops! You accidentally thought that companies have to follow the same rules as civies, silly you!

          • Kogasa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            They’re not distributing it. They’re taking a screenshot, identifying the content, and transmitting hashed and aggregated data. Even if they were transmitting screenshots, they’d be transmitting it to their own systems to be hashed and analyzed, not watched.

          • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, see my comment to FlyingSquid about how I assume things work under the hood. The only logical design choice I can imagine is that a hash of the content snapshot is being computed locally, and only the hash is transmitted.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You agreed to it when you set up the device. It should be illegal to have incredibly obtuse and impossible to read T&C, they should make it abundantly clear exactly how much of your personal information is being given away, but unfortunately it’s legal to just have a little checkbox that lets you lie about reading them.

          • gohixo9650
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            to be technically correct, they are not “distributing” it. They are doing the same thing shazam does for music.

      • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, but they do take snaps of the screen and send it to advertisers. Almost all “smart” TVs do this.

      • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And then someone gets the idea to find a way to play a VHS instead and be like “Let’s see you read that, you fucking spying idiots!”