• terminhell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m guessing, per the article, that as long as you’re not exposing telnet/ssh directly, you should be ok? If you’re doing that already, why? I could see having some iot device that isn’t properly segmented from the rest of your lan already problematic, and something like this would be a concern.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      I shouldn’t be on Linux, I don’t know anything about computers. This is why Windows is the safer bet.

      • TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Whenever linux has a big sercurity issue, its a big deal. whenever windows has a big security issue, its just another tuesday.

        That should tell you that windows systems are targeted much more.

          • naticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not all distros are that hard to get into. I personally don’t care one way or another as long as you’re comfortable with your OS, but it’d be worth giving Linux a try at some point. Mint Linux or PopOS! are both good options for entry level Linux (but not limited to just entry level).

            • Squizzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m switch to Linux soon just this type of thing turns me away because I have no idea what mounting a drive means much less how to do it and things like gnu, kernel and running on like directly typed instructions are alien to me.

        • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think it’s because the general public would expect a big company to come and fix it, like Microsoft. They feel safe because it’s a well known OS that everyone uses. So it can’t be unsafe, right? Right?

          With Linux you’re fucked if you have no computer knowledge, like most people. That’s the general thinking.

          • TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I dont think a non-tech savvy person would be fucked, I think it would deffenatly be harder to use but UX in linux has been getting steadily better.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          True, but that’s the point.

          Linux isn’t safer because it’s more secure, it’s safer because no one writing malware is going to target only 4% of the market when they could write malware for 60% of the market.

          • Sanguine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Maybe 4% desktop market share. You are not including Linux market share of servers; this would be a more worthwhile target.

            • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              But a much harder target, as servers will usually have someone at least semi-competent keeping them updated. Until rising costs and you know, the economy, force the ceo to choose between an IT department and a new boat.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Those servers are also sitting in and/or behind DMZs specifically configured with network based intrusion prevention systems to protect them.

              So while more valuable, they’re also better protected because network security is a thing.

              • Sanguine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah fair enough. I’d have to assume folks who spend time making malware want a return on their investment, whether financial or status / fame. Not a big ROI on hacking my gaming desktop or a thinkpad I use to stream movies.

                • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That’s true for all OSs though, you might be a target of convenience but the money is in enterprise networks.