• AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
    2·
    11 months ago

    Could easily rationalize it. Suckers are going to find a religion to con then no matter what. You could provide a less harmful option.

    I’m not saying you should, but you could find a way to justify it. It’s pretty easy money.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      8·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think a ‘less harmful’ con makes the con any more ethical. And I don’t want to take poor people’s money. A lot of people giving to televangelists are people living on social security and the like.