• HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, OP doesn’t mention who the 2 superpowers are. Leaves us to draw our own conclusions as to who they are, and currently only one nation has any real ability to project power wherever they need it. So, other than the USA, who is a superpower?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it’s pretty clear that US doesn’t have any real ability to project power wherever they need it. US is very clearly overstretched in Ukraine and the Middle East already, and it’s only going to get worse from here. US lacks the industrial base needed for high intensity conflicts, and existing stocks of essential things like artillery shells have been depleted over the past two years.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Then we don’t actually have any superpowers. Because if the US isn’t one, none of the other countries who think they are, would even come close.

        Edit: about the artillery shells, we don’t know how many they actually have.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          China is the biggest trading partner for the majority of the world, and it’s an industrial juggernaut. That’s what an actual superpower looks like. Meanwhile, we know that US has been running around pulling artillery shells from South Korea and Israel last year, and that the entire US production capacity for shells is far below the rate of fire in Ukraine. These are basic facts openly acknowledged by US officials. If US can’t even produce basic shit like artillery shells, it’s not capable of engaging in any serious conflict.