I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don’t know why.

  • Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    😂 I’m deaf you numpty. There’s entire deaf communities that don’t read or write english. It’s actually a hotly debated topic as some think kids shouldn’t be forced to learn both.

    • Gabu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Only in 'murica (and the anglosphere) could people think that learning more languages could possibly be a bad thing…

      • Devi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

        We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

        If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

        • DeadPand@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early…

          • Devi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You’ve got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

            Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.