• Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      Orbán is Putin’s butt plug and will be until he dies of old age. As much as I would love my country to stay in the EU, the only way to stop this raging toddler from destroying other kids’ Lego castles is to lock him out of the room.

      The problem is, once the country is out of the EU’s protection, daddy Russia will be happy to raise him an alcoholic, racist scumbag.

      I really don’t know how the country can be saved from sinking even deeper in the mud it finally emerged from in 1989.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The problem is, once the country is out of the EU’s protection, daddy Russia will be happy to raise him an alcoholic, racist scumbag.

        Oh no, Hungary could do so much damage on their own! /s

        And honestly, it’s a question how long Putinism is even going to survive. If the West can keep it’s shit together the answer is not very long.

  • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wonder what we gave up for Turkey to sign it. Maybe it was enough for Kristersson to celebrate his 60th birthday with a purposefully made confidential bill to taxpayers.

    Funny how his government always seem to transform things that were or should be public to confidential.

    Like the secret electricity support, so the ones who used much electricity when the grid was strained got a cashback. I forget the name but some people apparently had to keep their mansions and fifteen swimmingpools heated. Guess we aren’t equal after all…

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      As best I can tell, nothing. He held it up to be the strong guy for their next election, then let it go after.

      • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        First we gave out some Kurds, be it right or wrong, then I know there were different opinions regarding our freedom of speech and burning books. And that’s just what the public knows. The real deals are made behind closed doors

      • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        NATO should’ve been put as a separate issue public vote, whatever it’s called in English. To make an international example, in the US they can vote for big shit or the lesser shit, so people vote for lesser shit, but that doesn’t mean they want lesser shit policies.

        Imo it’s a big wrangled to say we voted for this, when we vote for packages and our options are severely limited. Maybe you agree?

        • skillissuer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          you mean it should be settled out in a referendum?

        • no banana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          What I meant was we did vote for the current government and their behaviour when it comes to financial policy is no surprise to me. In fact it is so unsurprising that I’m more surprised that anyone is surprised.

          Them being elected on the NATO question is kind of moot IMO since the Social Democrats already initiated. I think it’s fine to want to have a separate vote on the issue though I personally do not believe the public can be fully informed to make such a decision in our current world of nation states. That decision, and decisions on most national security issues, should be made on the basis of facts that you and I do not have access to.

          • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You can apply that to any issue. People will often vote against their best interest but it shows whether or not it was wanted.

            My brother in Carl XVI Gustaf they obviously had better information that the plebian, but still systematically dismantled the military to five guys, a bucket, and a goat. I wouldn’t trust them to put their boots on the right foot

            • no banana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              As I said, it’s fine to want the vote. I am not against it, but I’m not invested in it either. In the end our elected politicians are just human beings like all of us citizens, because they are citizens just like us. They’re bound to make mistakes like anyone else. Blind trust isn’t healthy but neither is contempt.

              • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Sure sure. I didn’t mean so. It’s just that we had multiple governments that apparently “didn’t see it coming” on anything.

                In gymnasium evidently we did a better world analysis after the Russian invasion of Crimea and subsequent illegal annexation. Placing Russian controlled agents of chaos and ruski green men in the Eastern regions.

                There was no question it would continue. Trump wants to get out of NATO, we’ll see how it ends. Not only this, but we have the CCP blatantly extending their territory and tricking other nations into shitty infrastructure deals that never amount to what’s promised.

                This rustles me so sorry if I’m just going on tangents

                • no banana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t disagree that these issues are very real and have been for a long time. We just have to trust that human beings can change their outlook when they’re proven wrong and that our politics are starting to align with the reality of our eastern neighbor attacking countries.

        • Vaniljkram@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          We have representative democracy meaning we elect politicians to make decisions for us. While we do have the option to vote on single issue topics it’s unusual, and there are more and less suitable topics for the public to vote on. Voting on the NATO issue is probably the least suitable. Much of the basis for entering NATO are secrets not revealed to the public. And considering Russia managed to tamper with the us election, can you imagine what impact they could have on a vote like this?

          • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            We’ve had public votes for single issues before, like nuclear power, euro, and EU.

            Russian and in extension Chinese influence is mostly astroturfing opinions. They give money to entities like PragerU and others to push any conflicting information. Hence the MAGA cult.

            Better believe in information war, herr Vaniljkram, you’re in one.

            • Vaniljkram@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Did you want to explain why it would be a good idea to have a public vote on NATO?

              • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Because then we’d at least have the option, and the people who are to be sent to wars get to actually weigh what they feel.

                It’s not perfect, but it’d be better

      • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 That doesn’t make sense as we’ve had the same information public for a hundred years before this government

        Edit I reread what I wrote and I misunderstood what you meant. We’re not equal in the burden we had to bear individually, less so anymore with all the secrecy and unofficial meetings with private entities.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Honestly I’m surprised at Turkey considering how friendly they’ve been with Russia in the past decade. I really thought they had picked their sides against NATO, but I guess they could see the Russian writing on the wall from all the way over there.

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t forget the Russian and Ottoman empires shared a border, and had a war the same time France and Prussia had theirs. Turkey is Europe’s defence against Russian expansionism via the Caucasus. Or at least it was - now it’s those brilliant and tough motherfuckers in Georgia holding the fort.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Turkish parliament has given its long-awaited approval to Sweden’s membership of Nato, bringing the Nordic country significantly closer to joining the western military alliance after months in limbo.

    Three months after Recep Tayyip Erdoğan submitted a bill on approving membership to parliament, MPs voted in favour of ratifying it late on Tuesday night.

    In a letter, he wrote: “I believe that a more intensive dialogue could contribute to reinforcing trust between our countries and institutions thus allowing to further strengthen our political and security arrangements.”

    Sweden applied to join Nato in May 2022, at the same time as Finland, in a historic shift in its security policy prompted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February earlier that year.

    Finland finally joined last year but Ankara pressed Stockholm to toughen its stance on members of the Kurdistan Workers’ party (PKK) based in Sweden, which the US and the EU as well as Turkey deem a terrorist group.

    While the decision is formally up to parliament, Orbán’s tight grip on his ruling Fidesz party means that the ratification, de facto, is in the hands of the prime minister.Hungarian officials have in the past presented different narratives domestically about Sweden’s bid, while insisting to western allies that Budapest would not be last to sign off.A senior European diplomat said: “It is crucial this dossier moves forward sooner rather than later and there are indeed signals all remaining allies understood the importance of having Sweden in Nato as soon as possible.


    The original article contains 685 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Steady on. Erdoğan’s Islamifying the place as a populist, undoing Atatürk’s vision. Turkey belongs in the GCC rather than the EU if it’s on its way to theocracy.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The EU is not about to let Turkey join, and the main reason is that Turkey don’t really want to.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not revoked. It’s stalled. There’s a huge list of things they’d need to do to join, and they basically haven’t completed any of it.

          Cyprus is a major sticking point, along with Erdogan, who while not quite being a dictator in name, is probably only a little way off it.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sweden has generally been pretty supportive of Turkish EU accession. Cyprus is a far bigger issue.

  • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    10 months ago

    Quick, someone call out Hungary’s lack of democracy again! Still time to avoid this shitty alliance. Don’t want to be in an alliance with criminal countries like the US and Turkey.

    Not like Russia is a threat when they can’t even take Poland. We’ve got enough defense with our EU and Nordic treaties.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Sweden is not like Finland where NATO has had an 80% support since Russia started their war against Ukraine. For understandable reasons – mainland swedes have pretty much never been at risk from Russia whereas Finland has no risks except Russia.

          But I think still a good 60% support NATO, right?

      • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lol I’m Swedish. It’s possible to be against NATO without being a paid actor. Jävla jänkare är helt korkade.

        • Welt@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think he’s American, and has suffered due to their inferior educational system (AU here, nice job negotiating with Turkey’s dictatorship for your own security SE!)

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      They made it an election promise to join NATO. It’s so sus that our own defence has been dismantled for 20 years, and when Russia is flailing we’re rushing through a NATO membership. No public vote on that one.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s so sus that our own defence has been dismantled for 20 years

        Yeah that was a big fucking mistake.

      • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Red army’s stationed in Berlin at the end of WWII, but Sweden doesn’t consider that a big enough threat to join NATO. Russian army is now in eastern Ukraine, which would’ve been deep within the Soviet Union at the end of the WW, and suddenly we have to join NATO to keep safe. You know, protect ourselves against imperialism by joining the chief imperialist block and give the top imperialists access to 17 military bases on our soil. We’ve become so pathetic compared to the swedes from the fifties. They valued true independence, we gargle uncle Sam’s balls instead to feel safe. Sweden was uniquely independent, we’re now in alliance with Turkey and the US. That’s quite a fall from grace and it makes me sad. Like I’m losing what made my country special.

        • Welt@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sweden wasn’t as uniquely independent as you think, nor as special. Countries’ leaders act in the country’s interest. The circumstances are different this time - Sweden, like Ireland, was notionally independent in WWII but we all knew whose side they were on, even if non-combatants.