Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

    • Darorad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mozilla doesn’t have the sort of leverage to make an impact by abandoning apple devices. Firefox has an incredibly low market share and this could push people to other browsers. People tend to use the same browser for stuff like bookmark and password syncing, so abandoning ios could have larger consequences.

      • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah I understand, but if Apple is fucking up with our development, not only for Firefox, for any developer that makes apps for phones… why keep following their abusive rules? When I say “stopping developing apps for Apple” I mean, any developer that dislikes the abusive rules of Apple and fees. If we abandon the system, the iOS users will need to move to Android or other systems that are more friendly for developers.

        • Darorad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh yeah generally I’d agree, with firefox I just think it’d be better to do what will push the fewest people away as long as it’s possible to maintain development.

    • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      The issue is that larger companies which could have an impact (Netflix, google, Meta) already have special deals in place that bypass these rules

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because then Apple fanbois will complain and tarnish Mozilla’s/Firefox’s reputation

      • Ferk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Developing a crippled port that is limited/restricted by design due to Apple policies would not really help Mozilla’s/Firefox’s reputation anyway. Apple fanbois will complain ether way.

        If those fanbois want a Firefox app on Apple systems, it’s Apple the one they should complain to.

      • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        They already do that, they can say whatever, they will be isolated with their shitty Apple products and if they want decent browsers then they will need to use decent systems. Apple can’t abuse of their power and force us to follow their abusive rules, they can’t even have a decent UI desktop. They are so bad programmers.

          • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just saying their OS sucks, bad designs, buggy UIs, etc. They don’t even decent software, and I already saw many stupid bugs.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Android was a victim of the NSO’s Pegasus because of WhatsApp, and possibly that only worked because Facebook negotiated with phone manufacturers to bundle dodgy pre-installed system apps outside the Google Play Store.

              Apple’s iOS was a victim of the NSO’s Pegasus because of iMessages.

              For me, that’s enough to completely steer clear of iOS altogether. I mean, the lack of customisation and control over my device was already enough, but that kind of vindicated it for me.

              • ⲇⲅⲇ@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, my Android doesn’t have WhatsApp, I neither have Google apps. It’s a degoogled OS. I feel free and things works, even my default web browser on my Android has NoScript (JavaScript blocker), to make it safer. With Apple… you are sold.

                • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ditto! No Google needed, and Facebook apps are prohibited on my phone. I can even get banking apps working with a bit of Magisk, working in Zygisk domain with a deny list hiding it from the apps. Apparently proper SafetyNet checks aren’t that common anymore.

                  For browsers, I’d recommend Mull and Mulch. Mull is a privacy fork of Firefox, Mulch is a hardened version of Android System Webview (the backend browser that lots of apps use). Both come pre-installed with DivestOS.