“Unzip to folder”

Clicks folder

Finds another folder inside

Any code that is anywhere near that unreadable let alone purposefully obfuscated is not making it past the review process

If Google tracks you using more than just cookies (probably), then yes

What’s wrong with email exactly

Unfortunately these factory farms already receive large subsidies in the US

Judge, jury, and executioner.

When you said “new” car do you really mean new or is buying used an option

You will always find a frost potion somewhere in that same level

I think it got bought out

Aeolian/Dorian mode mixture

If you need to use a chromium based browser, I recommend Eloston’s ungoogled-chromium

Not old at all but Ori and the Will of the Wisps has the best hand drawn 2D art I’ve seen

Just noticed your username–did you write that post? If so, nice work

I am not trolling, but was hoping for somebody, OP or otherwise, to explain why they believe the message of the meme to be true, so that I or other lemmings could learn a bit more about the subject. I’m glad that the community has stepped in to share their knowledge. My intent was not to be aggressive with my comparison to Russell’s teapot Blahaj, if that’s what led you to your judgement of my attitude, but to show OP that the burden of proof was on them to show why the two movements are as interdependent as they claim.

I see, thanks for clarifying. Where I was confused by Leylaa’s comment was when she said that getting rid of one type of discrimination would merely “shift” it to another group, which does not sound like the same thing you are saying here.

If I make a meme which asserts that a giant Blahaj in the sky controls the American government, and you call it into question, is the burden of proof on you to explain what it is about the meme you don’t understand, or on me to show you why I believe it’s true?

To put it in less sarcastic terms, the answer is that what I’m struggling with is the whole thing.

Are you just not even making an attempt to understand my point? In this scenario, of course black women would benefit, as they’d experience no police brutality. My point is that this magical elimination of a racial inequality problem would not make a gender related issue (e.g. the wage gap) automatically worse somehow, which seemed to be Leylaa’s point if I’m understanding that correctly.

This seems to assume that there’s a certain fixed amount of “bad shit” that must be placed on one minority or another. If I eliminated all police brutality (which in the US disproportionately is aimed at black people), does that somehow make things any worse for women?

Part 2 avoid being a reporter in Russia

I don’t feel like I need to; the burden of proof is on you to explain why both must simultaneously succeed or fail