I’m shocked that no one has said Essential Oils yet.

I have an entire playlist that’s just covers of Toxic. It’s too good of a song.

Try the versions by Solence and Calvin Arsenia.

What do you mean move? This series has been action based since DA2

Thank you! People forget that this hasn’t been a tactical series since the first game. It’s like people complaining that Zelda BOTW wasn’t a top down 2D puzzler.

I think people forgot how much flack DA2 got over not being a Tactical game like DA:O.

If you’ve only played the most tactical of all of the Dragon Age games and not the Action based variations that are literally the other 2 games, please stop talking

Don’t listen to the whiners. There are 3 games in the Dragon Age series and only one of them can be considered a “Tactical” game. Hell, I remember all of the fallout and whining from fans when Dragon Age 2 became more of an arcade hack and slash. And then Inquisition was just a combo of the two styles that leaned towards Action over Tactics.

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if we would just chuck woodchucks?

An artillerist can just be a chef making food golems.

Embrace the flavor. And by flavor, I mean change the theme of your character without changing the mechanics.

Is that a dagger or an incredibly sharp sushi knife? Is that a longsword or a butcher’s cleaver?

I personally have made this character as an artificer but you could do it as a rogue. A highly skilled chef who knows exactly how to cut (sneak attack). As an adventurer, you seek out new flavors and styles of cooking and aren’t affraid to try some dragon steaks, with harpy eggs, with a side of black ooze gelato.

Also there is a single feat that really helps push it.

Percentage of total for each generation. Your assumption of this info is that we should add them together. But if you look at the opposite numbers (percentage of those not identifying as LGBT+) you get 97% + 96% + 93% + 84% + 72% giving us a grand total of 442%.

Obviously you can’t have more than 100% of anything but it does illustrate that addition is not the method we should be using.

Instead we average them. Giving us 11.6% of the total population identifying as LGBT+.

The real information we’re seeing is that the amount of those who identify as LGBT+ increase with every generation.

Percentage of total for each generation. Your assumption of this info is that we should add them together. But if you look at the opposite numbers (percentage of those not identifying as LGBT+) you get 97% + 96% + 93% + 84% + 72% giving us a grand total of 442%.

Obviously you can’t have more than 100% of anything but it does illustrate that addition is not the method we should be using.

Instead we average them. Giving us 11.6% of the total population identifying as LGBT+.

The real information we’re seeing is that the amount of those who identify as LGBT+ increase with every generation.

Everyone should be an artist. It doesn’t have to be professionally but everyone should be creating something.

The American Dream and other unattainable goals?

We need to replace all of the Nintendo assets with meme versions similar to Sanic. This way, Nintendo can’t force them down and we get to make fun of them.

I say we make Plumber Guy and Princess Bleach of the Toilet Kingdom.

Can someone please tell me who the second character is at the bottom?

PLEASE! IT’S FOR SCIENCE!!!

Same. It became my goal to build fun settlements everywhere.

Because 1 Drakon is 1000 Cubic 100tholians, which takes 1000 Vornies to raise 100 degrees on the Flugar scale to boiling point.

Metric is very scientific, but it was made through arbitrary means. They chose to make it easier than imperial by using divisions of 10. But it’s all based on a single measurement that they made up through arbitrary means.

“We have this length called a meter. How do we define it? Let’s use it to measue something in nature and then use that measurement to define it.”

Can we get this dropped on the switch? It’s the only way I can convince my wfe to play.

Sir, you have taken my words and misconstrued them to make me appear foolish. To that I say… Touché.

So let’s get extremely technical and a little petty.

…

If we only count movies with the title “The Mummy” then we have:

The Mummy (1911) The Mummy (1932) The Mummy (1959) The Mummy (1999) The Mummy (2017)

I propose that because you immediately suggested that the “remake” I was referring to was the 1999 film and was immediately precided by the “original” then you are MISTAKEN!!!

That would mean that you believed the 3rd movie in this list was actually the “original”. How utterly foolish of you. I laugh at your expense. Ha ha ha.

…

But seriously, I grew up loving the 1999 Mummy movie and I refuse to see the newest one.