

the DNC is more concerned about goddamned identity politics
They don’t actually care about identity politics, this is a flimsy pretext to protect corrupt dems who are elected in deep blue territory
the DNC is more concerned about goddamned identity politics
They don’t actually care about identity politics, this is a flimsy pretext to protect corrupt dems who are elected in deep blue territory
I think you may be confused, partially because the article is written in a confusing way. It says Newsom condemns ordinances that prohibit homelessness without adequate shelter. This is a strange thing to write shortly after mentioning that he supports a recent supreme court ruling that allows ordinances that prohibit homelessness without adequate shelter. The article says that this is in keeping with a years long effort to get homeless people into shelters, but mentions nothing about any state support for building shelters. It does mention spending billions of dollars to clear homeless encampments, maybe in the hope you’ll assume this includes providing adequate services and shelter. It mentions an ordinance that targets homeless people who refuse shelter, but makes no mention of if the shelter being offered is adequate (one instance comes to mind where homeless people were offered one week of shelter if they gave up all their possessions. Reporting simply mentioned that only 8 percent accepted offers of shelter).
The way corporate news reports on homeless people is systematically dehumanizing and frankly genocidal.
Also: fuck Gavin Newsom. I hope a piano falls on him while he is walking down the street.
Makes sense. How can we expect our troops to drop bombs on middle-eastern children if they can’t get it up?
The gall of a country with 5% of the total population but 20% of the incarcerated population lecturing the rest of the world on freedom.
I feel like most of tech had already sold out by 2014. Really by the late aughts it seemed to be all gone; that was when apple and its philosophy had taken hold. Not that apple was the only force in that direction, it just felt like the apotheosis of the greedy and controlling mentality. MS had plenty of greed, but they were willing (in some circumstances) to play ball. Google seemed to love interoperability in the early-to-mid aughts, but look at it now.
I feel like Kurt Cobain would think this was hilarious
Go find a successful and ambitious person to fall in love with, marry, and be a happy male housewife.
Fun fact: the word husband comes from house-bond, i.e. homeowner. So “house-husband” is in a sense redundant.
Alternatively, find a job you are at least decent at and can tolerate. You don’t need to love your job and be passionate about it to be happy.
Another brilliant take from the mind that brought us “Liz Cheney and Democrats’ big tent strategy: Why courting Republicans works for Kamala Harris”.
Look, I’m glad that these far right parties are losing. But it’s going to take so much more than a few center-left parties winning one election cycle to end the rise of the authoritarian right.
I assume based on the headline that the person piloting the plane must have been a police officer
I was only half joking. They campaigned with Liz Cheney after all
This person notably didn’t say “my trans friends told me I was an egg, so I tried HRT just to shut them up.”
She kind of did, though? She says there were trans people who “WOULD NOT SHUT UP”, so she obtained E and tried it “just to prove it wouldnt help” (second to last post in the screenshot)
How long until democrats are campaigning with him
As seen in last US election, voting for the ideal candidate meant the worse candidate won.
Is there actual evidence for this? Was there a higher than usual vote for 3rd party candidates in this election, and has that been determined to be the cause of Harris losing? Legit curious.
I’m sure the “waste, fraud, and abuse” folks will be all over this one, and not ignore it because WFA is just a thin pretext for gutting social services
I agree, women shouldn’t serve in combat roles. Now guess what I think about whether men should serve in combat roles.
Trailer Queen
Can we not? Why take a dig at poor people to make fun of a rich person?
It’s unclear to me how they even could save taxpayers anything. It’s not like when they fire a government employee, the money shows up in people’s tax returns. I suppose they could fire the entire IRS so you just don’t have to pay taxes at all, but then I guess you aren’t a “taxpayer”, and thus not worthy of consideration.
I feel much better now that I’m reminded of my insignificance, ty
https://massgrave.dev/ works just fine with ltsc as well and https://www.pcrf.net/ can always use more money
@dessalines@lemmy.ml or the other lemmy devs might be willing to discuss accessibility improvements to the web UI, assuming you are also willing to do that