It’s a single shot, picked to showcase the technology. Even here the ear’s outline is messed with.

But more importantly the material/texture being replaced is wrong. Its way too bright and sharp. It’s no more realistic than the original, it simply has different drawbacks and frankly looks jarringly out of place. It also fucks up the eyes’ tracking and the water ripples on the ground.

And the world is slightly a better place.

No. He was a soldier, volunteered to be one and put his life on the line. The girls didn’t.

Because not only the donors but a big part of the Dem’s base, even here on lemmy that is an outlier, are pro-war.

Where did I say a malware injected GrapheneOS image will pass hardware attestation?

The problem is that an unmodified GrapheneOS image may also not pass hardware attestation if the app developer has not whitelisted GrapheneOS’s key.

Also I hope GrapheneOS would simply inform the user or refuse to boot if the image does not pass attestation. In that case an app itself requiring attestation, based on it’s own list of accepted keys, has no security value, only gatekeeping potential.

Hardware attestation verifies that the phone and the OS its running on are real and not an emulator or a fake malware laced version.

No, it verifies that the phone is running an approved OS. If the app developer does not add your OS’ keys it will fail. This included GrapheneOS.

We have been web banking for decades on platforms without hardware attestation. The potential for anti-competitiveness abuse is not worth it.

It also does not protect the user. If your system is actually compromised they can simply replace the app, not allow it to run etc. I don’t see how it protects the user if they chose to run an emulator, what exactly is the threat to the user there?

The EU is not doing anything in this, it’s some private companies.

It should do something though, forbid banks and other essential services from imposing arbitrary requirements for providing service.

Even GrapheneOS is not as insane to suggest ebanking should be restricted to locked down platforms.

EU should ban banks from requiring hardware attestation and other “security” excuses to refuse serving people.

No it says they any scanning must be in the context of sex crimes. It’s otherwise prohibited.

Iran has a population of 90 million. How many people do you think have died to make a significant difference?

Yes the best thing is for regulators to forbid banks from serving you for “security” reasons.

GrapheneOS is right, but again I can’t help but note them again attacking small Android manufacturers with unfounded allegations.

Comparatively their language on Google is very timid. Obviously they are not actually competing against Google in the mainstream part of the market.

Safe in the hands of the only country that has used nuclear weapons?

Are you drives encrypted by bitlocker ? If not you are not going to lose data even if you cannot get this install/PC to work.

Disconnecting them was a smart move.

They would be shot to death by Hungary’s military. Or any other member state’s where applicable. The EU is not a (federal) state and there is no popular support for becoming one.

Orban might be a piece of shit but that does not justify making the EU a state and forcibly taking sovereignty away from members.

Russia is not attacking the US, it’s just allegedly helping Iran. They have done similar thing in the past as well as more concrete support (say in Vietnam). The US has as well, most recently in Syria and Ukraine. WW3 is not going to erupt over this.

He would probably whip it out,hi very beautiful penis, most beautiful penis in the world you know, never been scarred, beautiful, everybody asks to see it.

You can add non-steam games to Steam Deck, not sure how that’s walled off.

Yes but Simon fucking Wardley (whoever the fuck he is) does not regard them highly.

Vietnam had tons of them, enough to force F-4s to get gun pods since missiles were not ready.

Pretty sure there were dogfights in Iraq vs Iran and India vs Pakistan conflicts.

The lack of dogfights in USA’s last wars are due to overwhelming differences in numbers leading to the weaker air force trying to avoid confrontation in general.

If stealth really works it certainly will favor dogfights versus bvr combat.

Motorola is based in a freedom respecting country not the EU so certainly they won’t get compromised by the hardware.