Friendly reminder that this is much less of a problem when you are not dependent on fossil fuels.

Graphene can’t come out with their new phone fast enough.

Trust me! Pay no attention to the huge heaps of cash money.

GitHub has indeed become such a slop fest since Microslop bought it.

What must it be like living in such a grossly simplified, white-and-black world?

They then proceeded to divert the flight to the wrong airport once it finally did takeoff.

I’ll wager a guess that person didn’t vote.

That’s flipping hilarious.

We call those people Seniors in my org.

A rare treat that they were able to extract all the payloads. Usually with these things, they don’t forward-deploy their capabilities.

Buying an expensive road bicycle has been described as a more healthy and affordable response to a midlife crisis than buying an expensive sports car.

Ah, Posers then. But yes at least it’s a healthier response. There’s worse things.

Although this is not my home instance, I just want to say: thank you for helping to make the fediverse great.

I love this game. It’s chill.

Is this meant to be an advertisement? It looks like an ad.

I’m not sure we have laws. It depends heavily on who you are whether or not they are enforced. They are more notional generalisms of what we think the law ought to be rather than what it actually is.

Definitely share your initial concern. Without strong review processes to ensure that every line of code follows the intent of the human developer, there’s no way of knowing what exactly is in there and the implications for the human users. And I’m not just talking about bugs.

They say it’s reviewed, but the temptation to blindly trust is there. In this case, developer appears to have taken some care.

The code was written by Cursor and Claude, but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings.

Let us hope so. Handle with care to ensure responsibility is not offloaded to a machine instead of a person.

Why make it so specific? Can’t we make it illegal to benefit from material, non-public information?

This is still insider trading, which ought to be illegal, but it appears to be generally accepted.

Colloquially, it’s the rat race. There’s nothing inherently wrong with striving nor sacrifice, but we must ask: to what end? At what cost? To what success if it costs you your soul? It better be worth it.

Social focus on individualism sounds like a dog’s focus on chocolate.

Hm, good point. Perhaps the overconfidence AI might provide is even worse than knowing you don’t know.

Mixed feelings about this. Let me play devils advocate and say that many Americans don’t have access to these resources at all. Having potentially inaccurate resources might be better than nothing, or is that worse?