Expert developer, Buddhist

  • 7 Posts
  • 387 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle



  • Lung@lemmy.worldtotumblr@lemmy.worldenshittification
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Totally unproven dream of the fediverse*

    Imo it’ll go like this. 50%+ of the users captured on a single instance. Basically lemmy.world already. It continues to scale until there’s millions of active users. Costs get too high and the offer of investment money is too good. The instance sells out. Non-federated killer features creep in ala embrace / extend / extinguish. Nobody else in the community can afford to run it at that scale, too much admin and servers. Data export is turned off. Users don’t know how to get their accounts working on a clone or that it exists. Most of them stay on the big instance due to network effect. We end up with a new BlueSky, Threads, or Reddit. The investors win again. A new revolution begins over again …

    Imo we just enjoy it while it’s here & stay small






  • Well…

    If you follow the link to fedidb, refer to the “mau” monthly active users. Do some brief math and realize that lemmy.world accounts for about 50% of all active users

    Email market share is harder, but many estimate that Gmail accounts for over 40%. Many many orgs use Google apps to make custom branded gmails with their own domains too

    This is the typical “business power law” that states that the top player should control about 50%, the second player about 25%, etc. This is just kinda how the world works



  • Lung@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    I genuinely don’t understand why people here are railing him. All the article said was he wanted to research environmental causes for an increasingly common condition. That seems totally reasonable. Look at car pollution reducing avg brain capacity. Look at plastics pollution. Look at toxins in ultraproceassed food, many of which are banned in EU but not USA. Look at our water quality and lead pipes problem

    Look, I know he has talked about vaccines before, but literally didn’t mention it here. It’s totally reasonable and good for all of us to tackle pollutants, toxins, environmental quality. Yes, it’s likely that many health problems would be resolved if we understood this better; that’s a valid theory to pursue. But yes, I know, I know “maga bad”


  • I genuinely have no idea how to defend tech from big money. The reality is that the startup industry as a whole has been purchased by the vc machine, and success in any venture is highly coupled with your business network connections. They can afford to outpace you: it’s play ball or fall behind. There is very much a “silicon valley royalty” oligarchy that cooperates and prevents real threats to their power

    The world of tech VC is structured into a heirarchy where smaller VCs make money by selling their risky ventures to more powerful VCs after the company proves itself. It’s a pyramid

    The case studies are infinite here, but just look at something disruptive like Bitcoin was. The play? Blockstream was given 75m by the banksters to buy up the developers and communication forums. Eventually they were able to obtain the commit rights to the Bitcoin repo, and control the narrative on Reddit. At that point, the revolution was over, and the controlled manipulation to make money began – a new unregulated space where they could move the price however they wanted

    I don’t really believe in the fediverse. Why? Because of the business power law: the top entity in any space controls more than the rest combined. Stuff like email providers consolidated. We already see lemmy.world as pretty much “the” instance. Imagine they sell out, which is a very hard temptation to refuse at a certain scale. Or big tech makes the hot new instance and out funds it



  • To this day homies don’t understand the simple rule that controversy sells. It powers the brand. It keeps it in the news every day. Manage a steady drip of “bad but not soooo bad” controversy and you win. Case in point: Trump

    If you want something to end, get people to stop thinking about it. I suspect people just like having something to be mad about and “belong” to an ingroup of other people mad at it too

    Inb4 people are mad at me for “supporting Elon” by saying the above, right? Because obviously what he’s doing is so bad and evil that “how dare I” not stand up against it? Well, I hope you enjoy the ride


  • Lung@lemmy.worldtoAntiwork@lemmy.worldCathy, do the math.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    It seems like there’s more to it since you generally also have to pay the union dues, is that factored into the math here?

    Unions are tricky. Police union that keeps cops from being punished? Idk maybe not great. Union that pays dock workers that don’t actually work to keep automation from ruining the job landscape? I’m not sure. Teachers negotiating for fair pay? Seems great!!

    Like all things in society, we need nuance, not “unions good” or “unions bad”