TikTok is taking the US government to court.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          2 months ago

          If this were true, it wouldn’t matter that the US set up the social security number system, because Experian leaked millions of Americans’ SSNs.

          It obviously matters who owns a service that millions of citizens use from a country that is a political rival. You’re just hoping to shut down any conversation against TikTok with a whataboutism

          • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            We’re talking about individuals’ personal data stored by social media companies being accessible to others (governments, in this case). This has nothing to do with social security.

            The problem is that the data is accessable, but that’s not being addressed. This is an improper fix to an actual problem, just facts.

            • tborders@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              When signing up for a tik-tok account, I put in a birth date, a username, an email address for verifcation and that was it. I didn’t need to provide a drivers license, verify that the name I put in was my actual name, that the birth date was my actual birth date. Location isn’t allowed nor was it requested and neither was Nearby devices. It’s actually been a much better behaved application than any American social media app.

              • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s a bad analogy. Mass surveillance (continuous collection of everyone’s data) has very little to do with the number we use to track social security payments.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The ownership part was how it was analogous. That was pretty obvious. Any time a massive system is set up for millions of people to use, it quite obviously matters who set it up and why.

                  I just love when Internet randos pretend not to get analogies because I’m, gasp, comparing things which aren’t identical.

                  In any case, sorry to interrupt your stream of 15 second video clips.

                  • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Lol

                    What is the social security system was run by China?

                    That’s your great analogy. This is a social media company. Gtfoh

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          So Americans having access to American’s Data is bad but you think China having access to American’s Data is good?

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Alright, thank you for clarifying that you want more restrictions and laws against these companies, it just seemed odd for you to bring up those other businesses in a post talking about the TikTok forced sale and resulting lawsuit.

              I’m just happy about them restricting US Citizen data being brokered to adversarial nations including Iran, Russia, China, and others.

              • DrDeadCrash@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I want the issue of mass surveillance / data collection to be addressed, instead of this bs which is basically working around the edges the problem. Tick-tock shouldn’t be allowed to sell (/provide) user data to anyone but neither should Meta, X, reddit, etc.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          “if one authoritarian government does surveillance even across borders, why can’t all? Anything less than ‘i agree’ here is hypocrisy!”

          • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Noone is saying that. The argument is pretty much that people want more scrutiny applied to other companies beyond tiktok, and ideally not be under constant surveillance by any of them, not that people want to be monitored by all police states equally.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s a whataboutist cop out. People who like tiktok just wanna point out how supposedly since tiktok was targeted, then it’s all in bad faith and therefore there could never possibly be a legit concern with tiktok in particular. Any argument to be addressed with “ChInA bAd”

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t matter who owns it. It’s the data that the US government is accessing.

        I couldn’t give a shit about TikTok, I’ve never used it in my life. I just think the US should be open and say we are banning this as we don’t have control over it. Sure China is only doing what we are doing but fuck em. I’d respect that.

        Also, it’s got to be about silencing pro-Palestinian rhetoric too.

        If they ban TikTok they should ban FaceBook and Instagram too.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Also, it’s got to be about silencing pro-Palestinian rhetoric too.

          Yeah trump was talking about banning it in 2020 because he used his time machine to find out what it would be used for in the future. After his harrowing story from the future, I agreed with the effort to ban it because I lOvE gEnOcIdE

          …of fucking course it matters who owns it

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have a question for you. What is the difference between Google being banned in China and Tik Tok being banned in the US?

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There really isn’t, but perhaps they should be honest about that.

        Also, is Google banned or Google won’t do what China wants so left? I don’t know the answer.