• jmcs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    If that’s the issue they can leave at any time they want.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. All that does is give putin full control, essentially turning the country into a hostile vassal state like belarus, right at the Austrian border.

      • jmcs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        As opposed to being an hostile vassal state that can veto EU decisions and undermine european security from within? Where do I sign?

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes, of course. As long as we let them stay in the union they have a fairly large amount of EU rules and regulations they have to abide by, and can’t go full little Russia.

          The fact that Hungary can stall and blockade critical decisions is a structural failure in the EU governing system that needs amendment, not a reason to give a hostile country a literal foothold nation.

          Ideally additional protective measures against foreign interference would also be implemented that keep future meddling at bay.

          • jmcs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Pray tell how do you ammend the rules, considering such changes need to be unanimous?

            And it’s better to have a clear enemy at your gates than one badly hidden inside the gates (just ask the trojans).