mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 20 days agoBitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linuxlemmy.mlimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1537arrow-down17file-textcross-posted to: bitwarden
arrow-up1530arrow-down1imageBitwarden is now verified on Flathub for Linuxlemmy.mlmr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 20 days agomessage-square53fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: bitwarden
minus-squaremitrosuslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down9·19 days agoWhat can flatpaks do that others -snap, appimage- can’t? At least they don’t have weird naming of program (com.sth.sth.fk)…
minus-squarehenfredemars@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-219 days agoDifferent goals and different designs. Why are there so many Linux distro? Snap is proprietary. Appimage does not include distribution and updates. It also doesn’t attempt sandboxing of any kind. On the other hand, I find appimage very convenient to use.
What can flatpaks do that others -snap, appimage- can’t? At least they don’t have weird naming of program (com.sth.sth.fk)…
Different goals and different designs. Why are there so many Linux distro?
Snap is proprietary. Appimage does not include distribution and updates. It also doesn’t attempt sandboxing of any kind.
On the other hand, I find appimage very convenient to use.