Tim Miller says he spent two years making “Deadpool” and earned $225,000.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      How??? He directed a movie for the biggest box office franchise in cinema history - a movie that went on to earn $782 million in the box office alone.

      He earned $225,000 in two years of directing. That’s nothing.

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        What do you do for work? Because I think I need a career change.

        I’m not just being snarky, but 6 figures USD would change my life.

        • simple@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Why is everyone in this thread comparing themselves to a popular ~60 year old director working in Hollywood?

          Yes, it’s a good salary compared to the average person, but he’s not working an average job. He should be earning at least 5x more like his colleagues are.

          • eRac@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            This was his first movie. He wasn’t a big director. Also, he runs one of the big CGI/VFX studios, Blur, so if they were doing well he was making more than just his Deadpool salary.

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Your second point is completely irrelevant. Many people have side-hustles. But that has nothing to do with what he was paid for: this movie.

          • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            He should be earning at least 5x more like his colleagues are.

            Do you think it’s fair that any person ever makes 5x more than anyone else?

          • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            Did he spend a decade uni with a PhD 🤨. I doubt it and I doubt his skills are any more exceptional than most.

            Going rate for a first class SWE In most first world countries is ~30k USD. It’s an absolutely amazing salary.

            I don’t know about the US, maybe the QOL there is much better than the media portrays, but I think that’s more than enough money.

      • Magicalus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        9 days ago

        112,500 a year is plenty of money.

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Not when your primary work is irregular and you basically have to live and breath the work for the many months you are attached to it. Basically every waking hour you are on the clock, which makes the hourly rate pretty low.

          • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Isn’t that every salaried position though? Last year I was on 30k USD for 7 days a week all day. Always on call.

            That’s pretty common in my area for people with postgraduate in STEM.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              In most salary roles you would be tenured with job security, and you would be covered by an appropriate award that limits the hours you work in a week.

              In film production you get a job for a few months, and during those months you stay in a hotel or sleeper trailer, don’t get to see your family, and work from wake to sleep.

              You would work potentially 18 hours, go back to your room to prep for the next day, then get what little sleep you can before doing it again. For months.

              Then after all that you have no guarantee when your next job will be. Some industry professionals go years between jobs. It’s an extremely intense workload.

              • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Oh that’s interesting.

                In my region salary comes with no protections, we have no fault termination. So quite often contractors are salaried for the three months they’re on then cut.

                You’ll find a job and you might be there for 2 weeks or 4 months, who knows. Turnover everywhere is high as companies simply pay for GPT rather than hire developers, engineers, hr etc.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s about ten times what I used to make in one year.

        Also, he had the chance to negotiate a contract. If he didn’t either stand for more up front, or take points on the back end, that’s on him.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Deadpool made almost a billion dollars. I’m guessing most people haven’t spent 2 years being the person to make something that big and relevant and also got paid less than .03 percent of its revenue…

      • Magicalus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Acting like the director is the one guy who makes the movie what it is will never make sense to me.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          No one said they’re the only person to make a movie, but they literally decide how the movie will turn out, both large-scale and in the details.

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      It turns out that most Lemmyites are actually pretty wealthy, and hate having that fact pointed out, hence your downvotes. You’re totally right, though.