Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this, and happy new year in advance.)

  • skillissuer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    https://xcancel.com/leopoldasch Leopold Ashenbrenner, some chart maker and substack blog haver with twitter account. swallows all openai marketing materials hook line and sinker, i had enough of abyss gazing duty today wonā€™t tell you more

    • skillissuer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      his academic output is funny, he has 2 arxiv preprints, an article (?) published not in any normal journal, but instead on some other dudeā€™s blog (??), and an article at somewhere called unjournal, which claims that itā€™s not a journal, (???) but instead itā€™s a nonprofit packed with EAs. and that nets him 230 citations (thatā€™s looking up in google scholar, not going to fire up scopus just for that)

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        21 hours ago

        For all their talk about ā€œcathedralsā€ and ā€œgatekeepingā€ I think we donā€™t gatekeep the ability to compile a PDF enough.

        We should at least require all the weirdoes to write their bullshit by hand with a quill

        • skillissuer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          Ā·
          20 hours ago

          none of his articles (not preprints, arxiv handles this) have DOIs. even paper mills much worse than MDPI can get these