The U.S. plans to approve an arms package for Israel, including artillery shells, precision bombs, and GPS systems, though production and delivery could take years; Meanwhile, heavy bombs and bulldozer shipments face delays due to concerns over impact on civilians in Gaza

  • dependencyinjection
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I could, but the risk reward for such an action when we have lows in place prevents me from doing it. I don’t not do things simply because they’re illegal, I break many laws all the time, I don’t do certain things because the punishment isn’t worth the reward of killing your family.

    If we have a system of no laws then I would be more inclined to do it as your resources to find me are negligible compared to the states resources.

    Now I do agree that many laws disproportionately affect the poor in our society, but I would look for reform of the system rather than abolishing it.

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is a somewhat selfish take, and although I don’t agree with a punitive justice system as I believe reform will lower the victims of crime more than punishing someone, as you should be thinking about the larger society and how me being off the streets means I can’t blow up someone else’s house. Sure it doesn’t get your house or family back, but it is better for society.

          • dependencyinjection
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m going to end the discussion here. I have been countering your arguments with alternatives and adding my own thoughts. Whereas you have been saying nope not down with that, but not contributing to the discussion with what you propose or countering my points.

            Have a great day and keep an eye out for me and my RPG. 😉

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m afraid I don’t understand. Like I understand the words but not what you’re trying to say.

          • dependencyinjection
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well I’m not against violent revolution to change the system. I just don’t think anarchy will give you the world you expect.

            If you think the poor and marginalised or preyed upon now, how do you imagine that would pan out if we had no laws. The most heinous people would again rise to be the most powerful, it’s just there would be no laws to mitigate the damage they could do.

            • NSRXN (insurrection)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The most heinous people would again rise to be the most powerful, it’s just there would be no laws to mitigate the damage they could do.

              can’t accumulate power in a society without hierarchy.

              • dependencyinjection
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Plenty of countries exist right now with no government and rebels have seized power.

                If guns exist, then armies can exist, if armies exist then people can consolidate power.

                  • dependencyinjection
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    What are you talking about.

                    Suppose you get rid of whatever hierarchy you propose.

                    Do you not think people will still look to prey on others or control others?