Summary
JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.
Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.
This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.
Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.
You would think Yale would have something to say. As I see it, a law degree from there is useless, do you even need to be able to read to get in?
Not for legacy admissions, that’s for damn sure.