Summary

A new book, A Very Stable Genius by Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig, reveals Donald Trump’s ignorance on key historical and geopolitical issues.

During a 2017 visit to the USS Arizona Memorial, Trump reportedly asked, “What’s this all about?” showing a lack of understanding of Pearl Harbor.

The book also details Trump’s confusion over India’s border with China, his eagerness to meet Vladimir Putin before taking office, and his frustration with anti-bribery laws.

The authors claim their findings are based on extensive interviews and documents.

  • unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair, Pearl Harbors significance is vastly overstated. It was just a random fucking air raid like any other. All the stuff that led to it is much more important.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The random air raid that pushed US to war by narrowly avoiding catastrophic navy loss? Yeah, no biggie.

      Edit: are->air

      • unexposedhazard
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah sure they totally werent itching for any excuse to go to war and totally wouldnt have done so anyways. We dont live in a butterfly effect world. Just like killing baby Hitler would not have prevented WW2, Pearl Harbor didnt by itself make the US join the war.

        • qantravon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, it didn’t, but it is still regarded as the inciting incident that brought the US into the war. Stop apologizing for Trump being an idiot.

        • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even with other reasons to consider war, pearl harbor would have been enough for the US to join by itself. Get this, when another nation declares war on you… You are in a war. Now you can talk about what led to that moment, but that moment was war.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was just a random fucking air raid like any other.

      It was abundantly and absolutely not. It was the first raid on the US by Japan that was intended to show the US why they shouldn’t enter the war and spectacularly backfired as it became the rally point for them to enter.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was just a random fucking air raid like any other.

      I’d call it militarily pretty important. It was a very large air raid. It was against an unprepared target, sank important parts of the Pacific Fleet.

      It wasn’t a war-winning attack, and Japan got unlucky and didn’t have the Pacific Fleet’s carriers at Pearl Harbor at the time when they needed to attack, but if you consider that Japan’s strategy, the pre-war stuff and then Kantai Kessen was basically:

      1. Ensure that Japan has naval superiority over at least half of the American fleet. The Washington Naval Treaty had Japan negotiate a fleet with limits 60% the size of the American one, with the idea that the US would need to be split between the Pacific and Atlantic. (Unfortunately for Japan, the US had already broken Japanese diplomatic codes and knew that 60% was the minimum that Japan would accept and negotiated for that, but it still gave Japan an edge over the US fleet in-theater.)

      2. Conduct a surprise attack, sinking a significant portion of the opposing US Pacific Fleet. This is the attack on Pearl Harbor. This was analogous to what Japan had very successfully done the last time they had fought a great power, when they hit Imperial Russia at Port Arthur:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Port_Arthur

        The Battle of Port Arthur (Japanese: 旅順口海戦, Hepburn: Ryojunkō Kaisen)[2] of 8–9 February 1904 marked the commencement of the Russo-Japanese War. It began with a surprise night attack by a squadron of Japanese destroyers on the neutral Russian fleet anchored at Port Arthur, Manchuria, and continued with an engagement the following morning; further skirmishing off Port Arthur would continue until May 1904.

      3. In the time purchased by knocking much of the closest opposing naval force out, conquer and secure island airbases to establish a security perimeter.

      4. Wait for the Americans to conduct a prompt major naval counterstrike aimed at the area, as the Russians had in the Russo-Japanese War. Conduct an battle of attrition against this force, making use of submarines and aircraft from these island airbases to whittle it away, without having to actually face it directly. Versions of the American War Plan Orange, IIRC a decade or two earlier, did envision this prompt response, but the US had long-since decided that in an actual war, they would build up their forces to an overwhelming level and then strike.

      5. Engage it near the Japanese home islands with the bulk of Japanese naval strength. At this point, the American naval force would be weakened and could be defeated in a decisive battle. Japan would win a great victory, as it had against Imperial Russia at the Battle of Tsushima.

      6. As with Imperial Russia, Japan would offer fairly generous peace terms. The US, demoralized by the great loss and with a limited ability to rapidly field a major naval force in the immediate future, would accept.

      In practice, it didn’t work. And it had very little chance of working, in significant part because the US was already building a lot more warships than Japan had and had a lot more ability to build more than Japan did. But the attack on Pearl Harbor was an important part of that intended strategic-level process.