• ook
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    You basically wrote what I did, but from a different viewpoint.

    Your example with the cinema is also a typical apple and oranges example comparing a digital distribution with a physical service. Yes, when you sneak into a cinema the cinema provider is losing revenue because you take a seat someone else might have paid for. So at some point the cinema is full and cannot accommodate any more people that paid which would prompt the provider to check tickets.

    There is no such scenario for digital distribution. You are not taking anyone’s space. The provider can sell their product infinitely often. You even already pay for the traffic you cause with your internet connection. It is a very different situation but is always equated because online piracy is of course the worst problem ever.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is no such scenario for digital distribution.

      The whole point it that content has been consumed without purchasing a proper licence.

      • ook
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, the point is that just because you pirated it, it doesn’t mean you would have paid for the content if there were no way to pirate it.

          • ook
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes, you almost got it. Well done. I’ll leave you with that.