• cmnybo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    How many failures did they just make disappear?

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Even if we ignore the blatant “chinaman bad”, this doesn’t make any sense. Why would they disappear people? This would still be a great outcome for them even with 80% success rate or something. The only difference between 80% and 100% is a tiny bit of nerd cred in recreational science communities. Even the logistical effort of “disappearing” people, while keeping everyone quiet about it, is clearly not worth the benefit here, let alone the potential international scandal.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Ah yes, the sinister Chinese. Even when they’re doing something good, they’re secretly doing something bad

    • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      love 2 come to the science comm and cast aspersions with absolutely no evidence

      something something that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed similarly etc

      weird racist loser

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably a lot. The academic honesty in China is abyssmal. I wouldn’t trust a single research article out of there without other independent institutions verifying the results and trying the experiments themselves.