• Swedneck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    you mean… sidewalks? because those are very clearly sidewalks; as they are narrow, made of concrete, and there’s absolutely no sign that bikes are allowed or were considered in the design.

    I mean just look at the crossings, those are explicitly pedestrian crossings lol.

    • GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Not at all, pedestrians roadways.

      We bicyclist cannot accept less, I live where yes, sidewalks are rare & available in more quality in the nearest cities, but they are minimum & not wide enough. We must demand better.

      Our (I assume) country is more wealthy, than Scandinavian countries, yet they have better separation & whole roadways converted for non-motorized cyclist & can be used to get to more place, where I live such roadway is 15-miles away, with traffic from my home it takes 45-Mins. to get to it & it only goes along side US1 & connects to Metrorail’s first Southern Station & Metrobus station. I think letting other non-motorized ways for pedestrians to get around is okay.