Gollum@feddit.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoUsing a sledgehammer to crack a nuti.imgur.comimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1223arrow-down16
arrow-up1217arrow-down1imageUsing a sledgehammer to crack a nuti.imgur.comGollum@feddit.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareEufalconimorphlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·1 year agoWell, you’ve got 1. And -1. And sqrt(-1). And the unit pseudoscalars of the Clifford algebras for every number of dimensions. So there are a countably infinite number of solutions. Can anyone find a bigger set? Something with an uncountably infinite set of solutions?
minus-squareRin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agonot sure I’m following. there are only two solutions to this. the equation is essentially: x² -1 = 0 x² = 1 x = ±√1 x = ±1 => x = 1, x = -1 supposing x was √-1: (√-1)² -1 = 0 -1 -1 = 0 -2 = 0 therefore we can certainly conclude that x ≠ √-1
minus-squareKogasa@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-21 year agoThere’s only 2. sqrt(-1) isn’t a solution. There are at most 2 over any integral domain.
Well, you’ve got 1. And -1. And sqrt(-1). And the unit pseudoscalars of the Clifford algebras for every number of dimensions.
So there are a countably infinite number of solutions. Can anyone find a bigger set? Something with an uncountably infinite set of solutions?
not sure I’m following. there are only two solutions to this. the equation is essentially:
supposing x was √-1:
(√-1)² -1 = 0 -1 -1 = 0 -2 = 0
therefore we can certainly conclude that x ≠ √-1
There’s only 2. sqrt(-1) isn’t a solution. There are at most 2 over any integral domain.