• 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point I don’t think I should have degoogled my life, I should have just gotten Google to pay me to continue to use their products. Given the what they’re paying everyone else, I must be worth at least a few hundred dollars a year.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 year ago

        In terms of my data on the market, yes. But in terms of Samsung’s user numbers divided by 8 billion I’m worth about $6. Based on what they paid Apple, each of their users is worth about $15. I just need to get my invoice on the right desk.

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s impressive. Usually the target organizations with a lot of autonomy, but poor payment controls. Like school districts… the schools usually have the autonomy to enter into their own small contracts, but a central office has no idea what invoices are legitimate without calling every school for each invoice.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, would that even be a crime as long as you sent them the ink with a 10000% markup?

            • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Depends on how contract savvy you are… if you word it as a service contract where acceptance is payment, you can sometimes get away with not sending them anything.

              But generally yes, that’s what you would do. Often times it’s ink for a discontinued machine that nobody uses before. The ink itself is probably recalled.

    • beeng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You are, but you’re not getting it.

      Probs get down votes, but look up data latte, you can put your data on the blockchain (anonymized) and get paid if somebody buys it, eg for market research.

      Which essentially is what Google does. Sells your data to the market

        • beeng
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The pure data isn’t sitting on the blockchain itself, but in a ipfs or something similar. But the contracts and tokens allow you to automate it and own it/give out access to it to a certain extent.

          Its a small project, but I like the idea, could be something.

            • beeng
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can go pretty far with that analogy. A docker container is just a glorified zip folder in a kubernetes cluster. Yes sure you get some of its functionality, but you’re missing quite a bit.

    • idunnololz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically based on how much you’d need to pay for the different services to replace Google it kind of works out? Eg. It’s the price you’re paying for free Gmail, search, calendar, etc etc.