image transcription:

big collage of people captioned, “the only people I wouldn’t have minded being billionaires”
names(and a bit of info, which is not included in the collage) of people in collage(from top left, row-wise):

  • Alexandra Elbakyan, creator of Sci-Hub. perhaps the single-most important person in the scientific community regarding access to research papers.
  • Linus Torvalds, creator of linux kernel and git, courtesy of which we have GNU/Linux.
  • David Revoy, french artist famous for his pepper&carrot, a libre webcomic. inspiration for artists who are into free software movement
  • Richard Stallman, arch-hacker who started it all. founded the GNU project, free software movement, Emacs, GCC, GPL, concept of copyleft, among many other things. champions for free software to this day(is undergoing treatment for cancer at the moment).
  • Jean-Baptiste Kempf, president of VLC media player for 2 decades now
  • Ian Murdock, founder of Debian GNU/Linux and Debian manifesto. died too soon.
  • Alexis Kauffmann, creator of framasoft, a French nonprofit organisation that champions free software. known for providing alternatives to centralised services, notable one being framapad and peertube.
  • Aaron Swartz, a brilliant programmer who created RSS, markdown, creative commons, and is known for his involvement in creation of reddit. he also died too soon.
  • Bram Moolenaar, creator of vim, a charityware.

on the bottom right is the text reading, “plus the thousands of free software enthusiasts working tirelessly.”

  • lemmesayOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I meant billionaires for their actions and creations, and not by birth like most techbros are.

    • NAXLAB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      That seems worse because it means they went out of the way to get so rich, rather than just having it handed to them.

      • lemmesayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was thinking more along the lines of “if they had that much money, their projects could’ve received more impact.”
        like if free software would become mainstream.

        though now I realise that’s an idealistic view and with money, people will become corrupt.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          If they received a lot of money from their work and they used it to increase the impact of their projects, they wouldn’t be billionaires. The money would have been spent on the projects. If Linus headed a non-profit that received 10B a year revenue and spent most of it, leaving Linus with 0.5M-1M yearly salary, he wouldn’t be a billionaire and the billions spent on the Linux project would have had a significant impact. If on the other hand he pocketed 1B a year, there would be 1B less for the Linux project. And Linus would have been/become a different person.