I’m curious how software can be created and evolve over time. I’m afraid that at some point, we’ll realize there are issues with the software we’re using that can only be remedied by massive changes or a complete rewrite.

Are there any instances of this happening? Where something is designed with a flaw that doesn’t get realized until much later, necessitating scrapping the whole thing and starting from scratch?

  • schnurrito
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Desktop apps nowadays are mostly written in HTML with Electron anyway.

    • Joe Breuer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which - in my considered opinion - makes them so much worse.

      Is it because writing native UI on all current systems I’m aware of is still worse than in the times of NeXTStep with Interface Builder, Objective C, and their class libraries?

      And/or is it because it allows (perceived) lower-cost “web developers” to be tasked with “native” client UI?

      • schnurrito
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Probably mainly a matter of saving costs, you get a web interface and a standalone app from one codebase.

        • Joe Breuer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Aware, yes. Interested, no - closed source philosophy, and the way Apple implements it specifically, turn me off hard.