• theotherone@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh you mean the 42 town-sized forward operating bases inside the treasonous province? They will come in very handy in the 72 hours it takes to resecure that territory.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      I always wondered how quick that would go down.

      72 hours seems quick, but I guess they wouldn’t really encounter actual resistance.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah “muh guns” are pretty useless against predator drones and air support

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Both of which are much better for the world than the current main industries of Texas: fossil fuels and fascism.

            • bitwaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Houston is the 4th largest city in the country, and generates a shitload of oil revenue. That’s way more important than Austin.

          • Swedneck
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            makes it real easy to justify liberating it then, doesn’t it? most of the people living there want to remain part of the US.

    • dlpkl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do people really think that the servicemen in the military would willingly attack Texans? I have a huge suspicion that they’d revolt within the armed forces.

      • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        As someone currently serving active duty, yes - depending on the command climate and the servicemember. Especially if the targets are labeled as insurgents and a VEO threat with credible evidence. Now, bombing noncombatant civilians is a different story, but as far as conducting surgical strikes on domestic terrorists, no hesitation.