• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    If we continue to tip as a wage subsidy, where is the motivation to make companies actually pay their workers?

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      you are proposing that if we all stop tipping, companies will be motivated to pay their workers; you are correct, this is what would happen if we all stopped tipping at the same time.

      this process is known as collective action. it is incredibly important to remember that collective action only works when it actually happens. in other words, your individual action of not tipping your waiter is ONLY beneficial to your waiter if you can make sure one else tips either.

      do you have this power? (i think you don’t; if you do i beg of you to exercise it lol.)

      now consider who actually holds the power here. at any point, your restaurant’s owner could institute a no-tip policy, thereby ensuring that no one has to tip, ever. several restaurants already have done this, and it works. now, you might (correctly) note that this may gives an unfair advantage to other competing restaurants who do not implement no-tip policy. this is where local and regional policy can come in to help coordinate transitioning to a more helpful model of compensating employees.

      so there’s kind of this imbalance, where yeah technically it’s possible for us as eaters of food to “fix” the tipping problem, but its way way easier for the people in charge (whether that’s government or owners) to fix it, because they have the power of coordination on their side.

      tldr, tip your waiters and advocate for anti-tipping policies if you want to maximize long term benefits for everyone.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        benefits for everyone.

        No, not benefits for everyone. Servers will never get a wage that’s equivalent to the tips they get now. Never.

        Go survey servers on the subject and see what they think.

        I’m not necessarily against no tipping areas, but I’m not going to act like it benefits the workers. It’s more of a crab bucket mentality where we bring the better paying low-skill job in line with all the rest.

    • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree with you, actually. If you don’t want to tip, fine, don’t tip. But don’t go to a restaurant and then not tip, either, because not only are you still giving the company money, you’re shortchanging the actual person you want to help.

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We are not short changing anyone. A tip isn’t a guaranteed income from working.

        Also, it’s halrious that you agreed with the previous person, then instantly renegged and said the opposite and went back to he same garbage you said before.

        Tipping culture is wrong. Never tip, stop begging.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think their point is being missed.

          In the USA at least in restaurants most servers work for tips. That’s 99.99% of their pay.

          They’re saying that unfortunately because of a tipping culture you’re taking part in exploiting the worker unless you tip.

          Businesses now adding tipping to POS for other stuff is their attempt to shift responsibility for paying their worker into you.

          I think the dude you’re replying to is mixing their messages some.

          • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thanks for the clarification. I sometimes get tunnel vision and forget people live in places with different laws and regulations. Yes, I’m specifically talking about US states where it’s legal to pay a waiter $2.13 an hour because tips make up the rest of federal minimum wage.

        • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not contradicting myself. All of my points can coexist.

          1. If you don’t want to tip, fine, stop tipping.
          2. If you go out to eat, tip your staff.
          3. If you want the tipping culture to change, stop going out.

          You’re correct, a tip is not guaranteed income, that’s the entire problem. I don’t understand why what I’m saying is so hard to understand. The company will only make up for lost tips for a waiter for so long before they’re fired. Continuing to go out to eat and then not tipping changes nothing, it just makes the waitstaff’s lives harder.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            If everyone today stopped tipping, do you think companies would suddenly begin to pay more? I’d wager that wage increases start with the waiting staff, and ends there. Why are you pushing the responsibility onto the customer?

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              If everyone today stopped tipping, do you think companies would suddenly begin to pay more?

              They won’t… And this is the point… Whether customers tip or don’t doesn’t matter. If we all collectively stopped tipping wait staff would still be the ones hit. It takes the wait staff collectively quitting/protesting to cause restaurants to change their ways… Or management of those restaurants. The consumer in this case means nothing.

            • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m not pushing the responsibility anywhere. If anything, I think it’s the government’s responsibility to take the tipping loophole out of minimum wage laws.

        • Laraxus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          9 months ago

          The hostility is entirely unnecessary. If you eat out and don’t tip, the only person you’re hurting is the person you claim to want to help. If you can’t tip, eat at home. If you can, then do so while still fighting for better workers rights. It’s really not a difficult concept to grasp.

          • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            But this is specific to sit down restaurants. Do I tip when all I receive is counter service? Or take out?

            • Laraxus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              If you’re picking it up yourself, I think tipping is unnecessary. If it’s being delivered, I always make a point to save enough for a tip.

    • tswiftchair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      If we don’t tip, where is the motivation to make companies actually pay their workers?

      • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Employees who won’t be able to make a living will go elsewhere. it’s not easy and instant, but eventually if a restaraunt can’t staff itself, it will collapse.

        We should absolutely not be subsidizing restaraunt owners who are only keeping a float by paying low wages. if they can’t afford to properly pay their staff, they don’t deserve to operate.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Employees who won’t be able to make a living will go elsewhere. it’s not easy and instant, but eventually if a restaraunt can’t staff itself, it will collapse.

          Then why not skip the step of customers choosing to tip at all? Why wouldn’t wait staff just protest/quit to get better wages? Wait staff collective bargaining is > than consumers collective bargaining simply because it’s a smaller population that’s easier to get together under a shared premise. The reality is that nearly every waiter/waitress I’ve talked to about it PREFER the current tip structure. They make more money.

          Years ago when I first started out working, I also preferred it. I could walk home with a pocket full of cash well above minimum wage if the night was good.